Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33978889›Full record

ArticleAnnals of surgical oncology2021

Breast-Conserving Therapy in Patients with cT3 Breast Cancer with Good Response to Neoadjuvant Systemic Therapy Results in Excellent Local Control: A Comprehensive Cancer Center Experience.

Marieke E M van der Noordaa, Ileana Ioan, Emiel J Rutgers, Erik van Werkhoven, Claudette E Loo, Rosie Voorthuis, Jelle Wesseling, Japke van Urk, Terry Wiersma, Vincent Dezentje and 2 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of surgical oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 38% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. A clinical perspective on oncoplastic breast conserving surgery.Translational breast cancer research : a journal focusing on translational research in breast cancer · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Marieke E M van der NoordaaDepartment of Surgical Oncology, NKI-AVL, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. m.vd.noordaa@nki.nl.
Ileana IoanDepartment of Radiology, Policlinico San Donato, Milan, Italy.
Emiel J RutgersDepartment of Surgical Oncology, NKI-AVL, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Erik van WerkhovenDepartment of Biometrics, NKI-AVL, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Claudette E LooDepartment of Radiology, NKI-AVL, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Rosie VoorthuisDepartment of Surgical Oncology, NKI-AVL, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Jelle WesselingDepartment of Pathology, NKI-AvL and Leiden University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Japke van UrkDepartment of Radiology, NKI-AVL, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Terry WiersmaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, NKI-AVL, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Vincent DezentjeDepartment of Medical Oncology, NKI-AVL, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Marie-Jeanne T F D Vrancken PeetersDepartment of Surgical Oncology, NKI-AVL, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Frederieke H van DuijnhovenDepartment of Surgical Oncology, NKI-AVL, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
The Netherlands Cancer Institute · NLIRCCS Policlinico San Donato · ITLeiden University Medical Center · NLUniversity of Amsterdam · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMany cT3 breast cancer patients are treated with mastectomy, regardless of response to neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NST). We evaluated local control of cT3 patients undergoing breast-conserving therapy (BCT) based on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) evaluation post-NST. In addition, we analyzed predictive characteristics for positive margins after breast-conserving surgery (BCS).

methodsAll cT3 breast cancer patients who underwent BCS after NST between 2002 and 2015 at the Netherlands Cancer Institute were included. Local recurrence-free interval (LRFI) was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method, and predictors for positive margins were analyzed using univariable analysis and multivariable logistic regression.

resultsOf 114 patients undergoing BCS post-NST, 75 had negative margins, 16 had focally positive margins, and 23 had positive margins. Of those with (focally) positive margins, 12 underwent radiotherapy, 6 underwent re-excision, and 21 underwent mastectomy. Finally, 93/114 patients were treated with BCT (82%), with an LRFI of 95.9% (95% confidence interval [CI] 91.5-100%) after a median follow-up of 7 years. Predictors for positive margins in univariable analysis were hormone receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HR+/HER2-) subtype, lobular carcinoma, and non-mass enhancement (NME) on pre-NST MRI. MRI response was not correlated to positive margins. In multivariable regression, the odds of positive margins were decreased in patients with HER2-positive (HER2+; odds ratio [OR] 0.27, 95% CI 0.10-0.73; p = 0.01) and TN tumors (OR 0.17, 95% CI 0.03-0.82; p = 0.028). A trend toward positive margins was observed in patients with NME (OR 2.38, 95% CI 0.98-5.77; p = 0.055).

conclusionBCT could be performed in 82% of cT3 patients in whom BCT appeared feasible on post-NST MRI. Local control in these patients was excellent. In those patients with HR+/HER2- tumors, NME on MRI, or invasive lobular carcinoma, the risk of positive margins should be considered preoperatively.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsMastectomy, SegmentalFemaleHumansMastectomyNeoadjuvant TherapyNeoplasm Recurrence, Local

Identifiers

PMID33978889
OpenAlexW3160079018

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.