ReviewPediatric radiology2022
Contrast-enhanced body magnetic resonance angiography: how we do it.
Review in Pediatric radiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Gadolinium toxicity: mechanisms, clinical manifestations, and nanoparticle role.Archives of toxicology · 2025Review
- Factors Affecting the Quality of Non-contrast Coronary Magnetic Resonance Angiography Images: Challenges and Change.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Review
- Urgent and emergent pediatric cardiovascular imaging.Pediatric radiology · 2025Review
- Anatomical variations of hepatic arteries: implications for clinical practice.Frontiers in surgery · 2025Review
- Value of spinal high temporal/high spatial resolution CE-MRA in the diagnosis of spinal dural arteriovenous fistulas.Zhong nan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Central South University. Medical sciences · 2024Article
- Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Atherosclerotic Renal Artery Stenosis: The Update and Future Directions from Interventional Perspective.Kidney diseases (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Pediatric magnetic resonance angiography: to contrast or not to contrast.Pediatric radiology · 2023Review
- Improving protocols for whole-body magnetic resonance imaging: oncological and inflammatory applications.Pediatric radiology · 2023Review
- Myocardial late gadolinium enhancement using delayed 3D IR-FLASH in the pediatric population: feasibility and diagnostic performance compared to single-shot PSIR-bSSFP.Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This review introduces the basic principles of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) angiography and details four contrast-enhanced MR angiography sequences for body imaging with extracellular gadolinium-based contrast agents in pediatric patients. Specifically, this review covers (1) respiratory-navigated, cardiac-gated MR angiography; (2) time-resolved MR angiography; (3) conventional MR angiography; and (4) modified spoiled gradient echo variants. We present and discuss indications, technical considerations, sequence optimization, advantages and disadvantages, along with practical tips and illustrative case examples for each sequence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
33978803What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.