Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33978789›Full record

ReviewPediatric radiology2021

Contrast-enhanced genitosonography and colosonography: emerging alternatives to fluoroscopy.

Jeanne S Chow, Richard D Bellah, Kassa Darge, Aikaterini Ntoulia, Andrew S Phelps, Michael Riccabona, Susan J Back

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Pediatric radiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jeanne S ChowDepartment of Radiology, Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard University, 300 Longwood Ave., Boston, MA, 02115, USA. Jeanne.chow@childrens.harvard.edu.
Richard D BellahDepartment of Radiology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Kassa DargeDepartment of Radiology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Aikaterini NtouliaDepartment of Radiology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9853-4873
Andrew S PhelpsDepartment of Radiology, Benioff Children's Hospital, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Michael RiccabonaDivision of Pediatric Radiology, Department of Radiology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
Susan J BackDepartment of Radiology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Imaging plays a crucial role in evaluating newborns and infants with cloacal and urogenital malformations. Contrast-enhanced genitosonography (ceGS) and contrast-enhanced colosonography (ceCS) are sensitive and radiation-free alternatives to fluoroscopic genitography and colography for diagnosis and surgical planning. These imaging techniques are performed by instilling a US contrast agent into specific body cavities to define the genitourinary and colorectal anatomy. This review article presents the experience with ceGS and ceCS applications in children, focusing on the background, examination technique, and interpretation of imaging findings, as well as strengths and weaknesses compared to conventional techniques.

Indexed as

CloacaUrogenital AbnormalitiesAnimalsChildContrast MediaFluoroscopyHumansInfantInfant, NewbornContrast MediaChildrenContrast-enhanced colosonographyContrast-enhanced genitosonographyDistal colostogramGenitosonographyIntracavitary contrast ultrasoundUltrasound

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.