Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33978744›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2021

Clustering FunFams using sequence embeddings improves EC purity.

Maria Littmann, Nicola Bordin, Michael Heinzinger, Konstantin Schütze, Christian Dallago, Christine Orengo, Burkhard Rost

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Computational function prediction of bacteria and phage proteins.Microbiology and molecular biology reviews : MMBR · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. LambdaPP: Fast and accessible protein-specific phenotype predictions.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2023
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. A roadmap for the functional annotation of protein families: a community perspective.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Maria LittmannDepartment of Informatics, Bioinformatics & Computational Biology-i12, TUM (Technical University of Munich), 85748 Garching/Munich, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-8533-8163
Nicola BordinInstitute of Structural and Molecular Biology, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6568-9035
Michael HeinzingerDepartment of Informatics, Bioinformatics & Computational Biology-i12, TUM (Technical University of Munich), 85748 Garching/Munich, Germany.
Konstantin SchützeDepartment of Informatics, Bioinformatics & Computational Biology-i12, TUM (Technical University of Munich), 85748 Garching/Munich, Germany.
Christian DallagoDepartment of Informatics, Bioinformatics & Computational Biology-i12, TUM (Technical University of Munich), 85748 Garching/Munich, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-4650-6181
Christine OrengoInstitute of Structural and Molecular Biology, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, UK.
Burkhard RostDepartment of Informatics, Bioinformatics & Computational Biology-i12, TUM (Technical University of Munich), 85748 Garching/Munich, Germany.
Technical University of Munich · DEInstitute of Structural and Molecular Biology · GBWeihenstephan-Triesdorf University of Applied Sciences · DE

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/R009597/1BMBF 031L0168Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft RO1320/4-1German Ministry for Research and Education
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

motivationClassifying proteins into functional families can improve our understanding of protein function and can allow transferring annotations within one family. For this, functional families need to be 'pure', i.e., contain only proteins with identical function. Functional Families (FunFams) cluster proteins within CATH superfamilies into such groups of proteins sharing function. 11% of all FunFams (22 830 of 203 639) contain EC annotations and of those, 7% (1526 of 22 830) have inconsistent functional annotations.

resultsWe propose an approach to further cluster FunFams into functionally more consistent sub-families by encoding their sequences through embeddings. These embeddings originate from language models transferring knowledge gained from predicting missing amino acids in a sequence (ProtBERT) and have been further optimized to distinguish between proteins belonging to the same or a different CATH superfamily (PB-Tucker). Using distances between embeddings and DBSCAN to cluster FunFams and identify outliers, doubled the number of pure clusters per FunFam compared to random clustering. Our approach was not limited to FunFams but also succeeded on families created using sequence similarity alone. Complementing EC annotations, we observed similar results for binding annotations. Thus, we expect an increased purity also for other aspects of function. Our results can help generating FunFams; the resulting clusters with improved functional consistency allow more reliable inference of annotations. We expect this approach to succeed equally for any other grouping of proteins by their phenotypes. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: Code and embeddings are available via GitHub: https://github.com/Rostlab/FunFamsClustering. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

Identifiers

PMID33978744
PMCPMC8545299
OpenAlexW3161612534

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.