ArticleHealth policy and planning2021
The devil is in the detail: reflections on the value and application of cognitive interviewing to strengthen quantitative surveys in global health.
Article in Health policy and planning, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 55 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
55 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Pooled it
- The impact of a direct to beneficiary mobile communication program on reproductive and child health outcomes: a randomised controlled trial in India.BMJ global health · 2022Trial
- Exploring methodology for investigating Chinese coronary artery disease patient values and preferences: A methodological study protocol.Global health research and policy · 2026Article
- The Implementation Research and Evaluation section: scope and future.Health policy and planning · 2026Article
- Mayo Test Drive Español: A model of digital cognitive test adaptation.The Clinical neuropsychologist · 2026Article
- Article
- Applying cognitive interviewing process to refine an instrument for measuring deprescribing experience and outcomes in older veterans.Journal of patient-reported outcomes · 2026Article
- Content validity of the modified EQ-HWB-9 in a sample of Argentinean patients, informal caregivers, and members of the general public.Health and quality of life outcomes · 2026Article
- Development and validation of the first needs-based quality of life measure for individuals with manifest Huntington's disease.Journal of neurology · 2026Article
- Validity and reliability of the Amharic version Revised Child Anxiety and Depression Scale (RCADS-25) in pediatric oncology.BMC psychology · 2026Article
- Cognitive Testing of the People's Voice Survey Instrument to Assess Adults' and Adolescents' Experience in European Healthcare Systems.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Translation, validation, and reliability of Örebro Musculoskeletal Screening Questionnaire in Nepali.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2026Article
- Implementing Problem Management Plus (PM+) in Haiti: qualitative study.BJPsych open · 2026Article
- Evaluation of a patient educational brochure to increase knowledge of cervical cancer screening among women living with HIV in La Romana.BMC public health · 2026Article
- Enhancing Face Validity Using Cognitive Interviewing Techniques: Applying Tourangeau's Framework to the Nursing Talent Identification Scale.Journal of caring sciences · 2026Article
- Assessment of the content validity of the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) in patients with Degenerative Disc Disease (DDD): a qualitative study.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2026Article
- Development and preliminary validation of a fertility concept scale for Chinese post-00s college students based on thematic analysis.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- "Please speak in Hindi": Cognitive interviews to improve measurement of digital access in North India.PloS one · 2026Article
- Constructing self-rated oral health among disadvantaged older African Americans.Frontiers in oral health · 2026Article
- Surveying the oral health needs of international students in Canada.Frontiers in oral health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cognitive interviewing is a qualitative research method for improving the validity of quantitative surveys, which has been underused by academic researchers and monitoring and evaluation teams in global health. Draft survey questions are administered to participants drawn from the same population as the respondent group for the survey itself. The interviewer facilitates a detailed discussion with the participant to assess how the participant interpreted each question and how they formulated their response. Draft survey questions are revised and undergo additional rounds of cognitive interviewing until they achieve high comprehension and cognitive match between the research team's intent and the target population's interpretation. This methodology is particularly important in global health when surveys involve translation or are developed by researchers who differ from the population being surveyed in terms of socio-demographic characteristics, worldview, or other aspects of identity. Without cognitive interviewing, surveys risk measurement error by including questions that respondents find incomprehensible, that respondents are unable to accurately answer, or that respondents interpret in unintended ways. This methodological musing seeks to encourage a wider uptake of cognitive interviewing in global public health research, provide practical guidance on its application, and prompt discussion on its value and practice. To this end, we define cognitive interviewing, discuss how cognitive interviewing compares to other forms of survey tool development and validation, and present practical steps for its application. These steps cover defining the scope of cognitive interviews, selecting and training researchers to conduct cognitive interviews, sampling participants, collecting data, debriefing, analysing the emerging findings, and ultimately generating revised, validated survey questions. We close by presenting recommendations to ensure quality in cognitive interviewing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.