Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33978553›Full record

ArticleAttachment & human development2021

Six attachment discourses: convergence, divergence and relay.

Robbie Duschinsky, Lianne Bakkum, Julia M M Mannes, Guy C M Skinner, Melody Turner, Alissa Mann, Barry Coughlan, Sophie Reijman, Sarah Foster, Helen Beckwith

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Attachment & human development, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Editorial Perspective: On the need for clarity about attachment terminology.Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Robbie DuschinskyDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Lianne BakkumDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Julia M M MannesDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Guy C M SkinnerInstitute of Criminology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Melody TurnerDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Alissa MannDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Barry CoughlanDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Sophie ReijmanCenter for Early Intervention and Family Studies, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Sarah FosterDepartment of Social Work, Education and Community Wellbeing, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Helen BeckwithDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
University of Cambridge · GBNorthumbria University · GBUniversity of Bath · GBUniversity of Copenhagen · DKVrije Universiteit Amsterdam · NL

Funding

Wellcome Trust 103343Wellcome Trust 208155Wellcome Trust 208155/Z/17/ZWellcome Trust 208505
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Attachment concepts are used in diverging ways, which has caused confusion in communication among researchers, among practitioners, and between researchers and practitioners, and hinders their potential for collaboration. In this essay we explore how attachment concepts may vary in meaning across six different domains: popular discourses, developmental science, social psychological science, psychiatric diagnosis, psychotherapy, and child welfare practice. We attempt to typify these forms of attachment discourse by highlighting points of convergence, divergence, and relay between the different domains. Our general conclusions are that diversity in the use of attachment concepts across different domains of application has been largely unrecognised, and that recognition of these differences would reduce confusion, help identify sites where infrastructure needs to be developed to support coordination, and strengthen opportunities for collaboration to mutual benefit. We suggest that academic attachment discourse would benefit from clarification of core terminology, including: "attachment", "internal working model", "trauma", and "dysregulation".

Indexed as

Mental DisordersObject AttachmentChildHumansPsychotherapyAttachmentchild welfaredevelopmental sciencepsychotherapysociology of science

Identifiers

PMID33978553
PMCPMC7616627
OpenAlexW3163901347

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.