Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33978240›Full record

ArticleMedical physics2021

Evaluation of novel AI-based extended field-of-view CT reconstructions.

Gabriel Paiva Fonseca, Matthias Baer-Beck, Eric Fournie, Christian Hofmann, Ilaria Rinaldi, Michel C Ollers, Wouter J C van Elmpt, Frank Verhaegen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical physics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. [Reconstruction from CT truncated data based on dual-domain transformer coupled feature learning].Nan fang yi ke da xue xue bao = Journal of Southern Medical University · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Consensus guide on CT-based prediction of stopping-power ratio using a Hounsfield look-up table for proton therapy.Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Gabriel Paiva FonsecaDepartment of Radiation Oncology (MAASTRO), GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, 6229 ET, The Netherlands.
Matthias Baer-BeckSiemens Healthcare GmbH, Forchheim, Germany.
Eric FournieSiemens Healthcare GmbH, Forchheim, Germany.
Christian HofmannSiemens Healthcare GmbH, Forchheim, Germany.
Ilaria RinaldiDepartment of Radiation Oncology (MAASTRO), GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, 6229 ET, The Netherlands.
Michel C OllersDepartment of Radiation Oncology (MAASTRO), GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, 6229 ET, The Netherlands.
Wouter J C van ElmptDepartment of Radiation Oncology (MAASTRO), GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, 6229 ET, The Netherlands.
Frank VerhaegenDepartment of Radiation Oncology (MAASTRO), GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, 6229 ET, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeModern computed tomography (CT) scanners have an extended field-of-view (eFoV) for reconstructing images up to the bore size, which is relevant for patients with higher BMI or non-isocentric positioning due to fixation devices. However, the accuracy of the image reconstruction in eFoV is not well known since truncated data are used. This study introduces a new deep learning-based algorithm for extended field-of-view reconstruction and evaluates the accuracy of the eFoV reconstruction focusing on aspects relevant for radiotherapy.

methodsA life-size three-dimensional (3D) printed thorax phantom, based on a patient CT for which eFoV was necessary, was manufactured and used as reference. The phantom has holes allowing the placement of tissue mimicking inserts used to evaluate the Hounsfield unit (HU) accuracy. CT images of the phantom were acquired using different configurations aiming to evaluate geometric and HU accuracy in the eFoV. Image reconstruction was performed using a state-of-the-art reconstruction algorithm (HDFoV), commercially available, and the novel deep learning-based approach (HDeepFoV). Five patient cases were selected to evaluate the performance of both algorithms on patient data. There is no ground truth for patients so the reconstructions were qualitatively evaluated by five physicians and five medical physicists.

resultsThe phantom geometry reconstructed with HDFoV showed boundary deviations from 1.0 to 2.5 cm depending on the volume of the phantom outside the regular scan field of view. HDeepFoV showed a superior performance regardless of the volume of the phantom within eFOV with a maximum boundary deviation below 1.0 cm. The maximum HU (absolute) difference for soft issue inserts is below 79 and 41 HU for HDFoV and HDeepFoV, respectively. HDeepFoV has a maximum deviation of -18 HU for an inhaled lung insert while HDFoV reached a 229 HU difference. The qualitative evaluation of patient cases shows that the novel deep learning approach produces images that look more realistic and have fewer artifacts.

conclusionTo be able to reconstruct images outside the sFoV of the CT scanner there is no alternative than to use some kind of extrapolated data. In our study, we proposed and investigated a new deep learning-based algorithm and compared it to a commercial solution for eFoV reconstruction. The deep learning-based algorithm showed superior performance in quantitative evaluations based on phantom data and in qualitative assessments of patient data.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsTomography, X-Ray ComputedArtifactsHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedPhantoms, ImagingTomography Scanners, X-Ray Computed3D printingCT imagingextended field of viewHDFoVradiotherapy

Identifiers

PMID33978240
PMCPMC8362147

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.