ArticleMedical physics2021
Evaluation of novel AI-based extended field-of-view CT reconstructions.
Article in Medical physics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Synthetic CT generation from cone-beam CT using deep learning for head-and-neck adaptive radiotherapy.Physics and imaging in radiation oncology · 2026Article
- Novel extended field-of-view reconstruction algorithms in computed tomography simulation for imaging and volumetric modulated arc therapy dosimetry.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2026Article
- Automated quality assurance of imaging dose and protocol adherence in computed tomography radiotherapy planning using TotalSegmentator-based segmentation.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2026Article
- Deep learning in CT image reconstruction and processing: techniques, performance evaluation, radiation dose, and future perspective.The British journal of radiology · 2025Review
- Latent space reconstruction for missing data problems in CT.Medical physics · 2025Article
- Prior-FOVNet: A Multimodal Deep Learning Framework for Megavoltage Computed Tomography Truncation Artifact Correction and Field-of-View Extension.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Development of a novel 3D-printed dynamic anthropomorphic thorax phantom for evaluation of four-dimensional computed tomography.Physics and imaging in radiation oncology · 2024Article
- [Reconstruction from CT truncated data based on dual-domain transformer coupled feature learning].Nan fang yi ke da xue xue bao = Journal of Southern Medical University · 2024Article
- Effect of extended field-of-view approaches on the accuracy of stopping power ratio estimation for single-energy computed tomography simulators.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2023Article
- Generating missing patient anatomy from partially acquired cone-beam computed tomography images using deep learning: a proof of concept.Physical and engineering sciences in medicine · 2023Article
- Inpainting truncated areas of CT images based on generative adversarial networks with gated convolution for radiotherapy.Medical & biological engineering & computing · 2023Article
- Consensus guide on CT-based prediction of stopping-power ratio using a Hounsfield look-up table for proton therapy.Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology · 2023Article
- Traditional Artificial Neural Networks Versus Deep Learning in Optimization of Material Aspects of 3D Printing.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeModern computed tomography (CT) scanners have an extended field-of-view (eFoV) for reconstructing images up to the bore size, which is relevant for patients with higher BMI or non-isocentric positioning due to fixation devices. However, the accuracy of the image reconstruction in eFoV is not well known since truncated data are used. This study introduces a new deep learning-based algorithm for extended field-of-view reconstruction and evaluates the accuracy of the eFoV reconstruction focusing on aspects relevant for radiotherapy.
methodsA life-size three-dimensional (3D) printed thorax phantom, based on a patient CT for which eFoV was necessary, was manufactured and used as reference. The phantom has holes allowing the placement of tissue mimicking inserts used to evaluate the Hounsfield unit (HU) accuracy. CT images of the phantom were acquired using different configurations aiming to evaluate geometric and HU accuracy in the eFoV. Image reconstruction was performed using a state-of-the-art reconstruction algorithm (HDFoV), commercially available, and the novel deep learning-based approach (HDeepFoV). Five patient cases were selected to evaluate the performance of both algorithms on patient data. There is no ground truth for patients so the reconstructions were qualitatively evaluated by five physicians and five medical physicists.
resultsThe phantom geometry reconstructed with HDFoV showed boundary deviations from 1.0 to 2.5 cm depending on the volume of the phantom outside the regular scan field of view. HDeepFoV showed a superior performance regardless of the volume of the phantom within eFOV with a maximum boundary deviation below 1.0 cm. The maximum HU (absolute) difference for soft issue inserts is below 79 and 41 HU for HDFoV and HDeepFoV, respectively. HDeepFoV has a maximum deviation of -18 HU for an inhaled lung insert while HDFoV reached a 229 HU difference. The qualitative evaluation of patient cases shows that the novel deep learning approach produces images that look more realistic and have fewer artifacts.
conclusionTo be able to reconstruct images outside the sFoV of the CT scanner there is no alternative than to use some kind of extrapolated data. In our study, we proposed and investigated a new deep learning-based algorithm and compared it to a commercial solution for eFoV reconstruction. The deep learning-based algorithm showed superior performance in quantitative evaluations based on phantom data and in qualitative assessments of patient data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.