Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33978232›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of comparative neurology2021

Mapping reward mechanisms by intracerebral self-stimulation in the rhesus monkey (Macaca mulatta).

Douglas M Bowden, Dwight C German

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of comparative neurology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 51% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. A dopamine mechanism for reward maximization.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Douglas M BowdenDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences and National Primate Research Center, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.ORCID 0000-0001-5836-6070
Dwight C GermanDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences and National Primate Research Center, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
University of Washington · US

Funding

Washington National Primate Research CenterP51OD010425 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI Mari Ostendorf · 2012 to 2026
$201.8M
YILMA SIV VACCINIA VACCINE TRIALP51RR000166 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI DACEY, DENNIS MICHAEL · 1985 to 2011
$161.1M
Comprehensive Digital Atlas of the Macaque BrainR01MH069259 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI BOWDEN, DOUGLAS M. · 2004 to 2007
$2.1M
Spatial Information Management Resources for Human BrainR01LM008247 · NLM · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI BOWDEN, DOUGLAS M. · 2005 to 2007
$940k
SPATIAL/SYMBOLIC BRAIN INFORMATION MANAGEMENT SYSTEMR01LM006243 · NLM · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI BOWDEN, DOUGLAS M. · 1996 to 2001
$599k
NCRR NIH HHS P51 RR000166NCRR NIH HHS P51-RR00166NIH HHS P51 OD010425NIH HHS P51-OD010425NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH069259NIMH NIH HHS RO1-MH069259NLM NIH HHS LM008257NLM NIH HHS LM-06243NLM NIH HHS R01 LM008247
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The objective of the study was to identify brain structures that mediate reward as evidenced by positive reinforcing effects of stimuli on behavior. Testing by intracerebral self-stimulation enabled monkeys to inform whether activation of ~2900 sites in 74 structures of 4 sensorimotor pathways and 4 modulatory loop pathways was positive, negative or neutral. Stimulation was rewarding at 30% of sites, negative at 17%, neutral at 52%. Virtually all (99%) structures yielded some positive or negative sites, suggesting a ubiquitous distribution of pathways transmitting valence information. Mapping of sites to structures with dense versus sparse dopaminergic (DA) or noradrenergic (NA) innervation showed that stimulation of DA-pathways was rewarding or neutral. Stimulation of NA-pathways was not rewarding. Stimulation of association areas was generally rewarding; stimulation of purely sensory or motor structures was generally negative. Reward related more to structures' sensorimotor function than to density of DA-innervation. Stimulation of basal ganglia loop pathways was rewarding except in lateral globus pallidus, an inhibitory structure in the negative feedback loop; stimulation of the cerebellar loop was rewarding in anterior vermis and the spinocerebellar pathway; and stimulation of the hippocampal CA1 loop was rewarding. While most positive sites were in the DA reward system, numerous sites in sparsely DA-innervated posterior cingulate and parietal cortices may represent a separate reward system. DA-density represents concentrations of plastic synapses that mediate acquisition of new synaptic connections. DA-sparse areas may represent innate, genetically programmed reward-associated pathways. Implications of findings in regard to response habituation and addiction are discussed.

Indexed as

RewardAnimalsBasal GangliaBiofeedback, PsychologyBrainBrain MappingDopamineDopaminergic NeuronsMacaca mulattaMaleNeural PathwaysNeuronal PlasticityNorepinephrineSelf StimulationSympathetic Nervous SystemDopamineNorepinephrineaddictiondopamineengramhabituationintracranial self-stimulationnoradrenalinreward

Identifiers

PMID33978232
PMCPMC8920750
OpenAlexW3163478588

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.