Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33978115›Full record

Trial reportRevista de saude publica2021

Performance and perception on front-of-package nutritional labeling models in Brazil.

Luisete Moraes Bandeira, Jéssica Pedroso, Natacha Toral, Muriel Bauermann Gubert

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Revista de saude publica, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Primordial prevention: Reducing consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages in racial/ethnic populations.American heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Luisete Moraes BandeiraUniversidade de Brasília. Faculdade de Ciências da Saúde. Programa de Pós-Graduação em Saúde Coletiva. Asa Norte, Campus Universitário Darcy Ribeiro, Brasília, DF, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5520-5167
Jéssica PedrosoFaculdade de Ciências da Saúde. Programa de Pós-Graduação em Nutrição Humana. Brasília, DF, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5446-4319
Natacha ToralFaculdade de Ciências da Saúde. Programa de Pós-Graduação em Nutrição Humana. Brasília, DF, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0297-2340
Muriel Bauermann GubertUniversidade de Brasília. Faculdade de Ciências da Saúde. Programa de Pós-Graduação em Saúde Coletiva. Asa Norte, Campus Universitário Darcy Ribeiro, Brasília, DF, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0103-4187

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo evaluate the performance and perception of five models of front-of-package nutrition labeling (FOPNL) among Brazilian consumers.

methodsCross-sectional study, which applied an online questionnaire to 2,400 individuals, allocated randomly into six study groups: a control group and five others exposed to FOPNL (octagon, triangle, circle, magnifier and traffic light), applied to nine products. We evaluated the understanding of nutritional content, the perception of healthiness, the purchase intention and the perception of Brazilian consumers on the models.

resultsAll FOPNL models increased the understanding of the nutritional content and reduced the perception of healthiness and purchase intention, when compared with the control group (41.3%). FOPNL warning models - octagon (62.4%), triangle (61.9%) and circle (61.8%) - performed significantly better than the traffic light (55.0%) regarding the understanding of the nutritional content. The performance of the magnifier (59.5%) was similar to the other four tested models, including the traffic light (55.0%), for understanding nutritional content. The individual analysis of the products suggests a better performance of warnings in relation to the magnifier and the traffic light for the perception of healthiness and purchase intention. Consumers were favorable to the presence of FOPNL, perceiving it as reliable to increase the understanding to nutritional information.

conclusionFOPNL must be implemented on food labels in Brazil, considering that it increases the nutritional understanding, reduces the perception of healthiness and the purchase intention of products with critical nutrients. Warnings showed a better performance when compared with other models.

Indexed as

Choice BehaviorFood PreferencesBrazilConsumer BehaviorCross-Sectional StudiesFood LabelingHealth BehaviorHumansNutritive ValuePerception

Identifiers

PMID33978115
PMCPMC8064653

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.