ArticleEinstein (Sao Paulo, Brazil)2021
Efficacy and safety of dupilumab in two adolescents with severe atopic dermatitis.
Article in Einstein (Sao Paulo, Brazil), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We report the cases of two adolescent siblings with severe atopic dermatitis, who, despite weighing approximately 40kg, presented a good response to dupilumab with the off-label dose for individuals aged 12 years and weighing 60kg. Both had already used cyclosporine, azathioprine, methotrexate and oral corticosteroids for long periods, plus topical treatments with no adequate disease control. Skin lesions were constant and widespread, with frequent skin infections and very poor quality of life, with numerous physical and psychosocial consequences, such as dropping out of school activities due to severe itching, appearance and bullying. They also showed delayed growth and development. In 2018, dupilumab, an immunobiological agent, was approved for treatment of moderate to severe atopic dermatitis in adults and, in 2019, extended to the 12-17-year age group. Although it had already been approved by the Brazilian Health Surveillance Agency, the 200mg presentation (indicated for the weight of patients) was not available, with no expected arrival date. Therefore, weighing the risks and benefits of the situation of both, we chose to treat them with an adult dose (loading dose of 600mg subcutaneously, and 300mg subcutaneously every 2 weeks) despite the low weight. So far, they have received eight injections, showing significant improvement of disease and quality of life. There were no major adverse effects, only worsening of allergic conjunctivitis in one of them. The patients and their family are very satisfied, and we believe that the therapy has been successful.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.