Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33977944›Full record

ArticleLab on a chip2021

Efficient and gentle delivery of molecules into cells with different elasticity

Alena Uvizl, Ruchi Goswami, Shanil Durgeshkumar Gandhi, Martina Augsburg, Frank Buchholz, Jochen Guck, Jörg Mansfeld, Salvatore Girardo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Lab on a chip, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Three-dimensional array of microbubbles sonoporation of cells in microfluidics.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Sonoporation: Past, Present, and Future.Advanced materials technologies · 2022
    Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Alena UvizlCell Cycle, Biotechnology Center, Technische Universität Dresden, 01307 Dresden, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-5819-1482
Ruchi GoswamiMax Planck Institute for the Science of Light & Max-Planck-Zentrum für Physik und Medizin, 91058 Erlangen, Germany. salvatore.girardo@mpl.mpg.de.ORCID 0000-0001-9724-2898
Shanil Durgeshkumar GandhiCell Cycle, Biotechnology Center, Technische Universität Dresden, 01307 Dresden, Germany.
Martina AugsburgMedical Systems Biology, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, TU Dresden, 01307 Dresden, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-4818-2192
Frank BuchholzMedical Systems Biology, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, TU Dresden, 01307 Dresden, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-4577-3344
Jochen GuckMax Planck Institute for the Science of Light & Max-Planck-Zentrum für Physik und Medizin, 91058 Erlangen, Germany. salvatore.girardo@mpl.mpg.de.ORCID 0000-0002-1453-6119
Jörg MansfeldCell Cycle, Biotechnology Center, Technische Universität Dresden, 01307 Dresden, Germany and The Institute of Cancer Research, London SW7 3RP, UK. jorg.mansfeld@icr.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-0562-8206
Salvatore GirardoMax Planck Institute for the Science of Light & Max-Planck-Zentrum für Physik und Medizin, 91058 Erlangen, Germany. salvatore.girardo@mpl.mpg.de.ORCID 0000-0002-5350-0186

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Intracellular delivery of cargo molecules such as membrane-impermeable proteins or drugs is crucial for cell treatment in biological and medical applications. Recently, microfluidic mechanoporation techniques have enabled transfection of previously inaccessible cells. These techniques create transient pores in the cell membrane by shear-induced or constriction contact-based rapid cell deformation. However, cells deform and recover differently from a given extent of shear stress or compression and it is unclear how the underlying mechanical properties affect the delivery efficiency of molecules into cells. In this study, we identify cell elasticity as a key mechanical determinant of delivery efficiency leading to the development of "progressive mechanoporation" (PM), a novel mechanoporation method that improves delivery efficiency into cells of different elasticity. PM is based on a multistage cell deformation, through a combination of hydrodynamic forces that pre-deform cells followed by their contact-based compression inside a PDMS-based device controlled by a pressure-based microfluidic controller. PM allows processing of small sample volumes (about 20 μL) with high-throughput (>10 000 cells per s), while controlling both operating pressure and flow rate for a reliable and reproducible cell treatment. We find that uptake of molecules of different sizes is correlated with cell elasticity whereby delivery efficiency of small and big molecules is favoured in more compliant and stiffer cells, respectively. A possible explanation for this opposite trend is a different size, number and lifetime of opened pores. Our data demonstrates that PM reliably and reproducibly delivers impermeable cargo of the size of small molecule inhibitors such as 4 kDa FITC-dextran with >90% efficiency into cells of different mechanical properties without affecting their viability and proliferation rates. Importantly, also much larger cargos such as a >190 kDa Cas9 protein-sgRNA complex are efficiently delivered high-lighting the biological, biomedical and clinical applicability of our findings.

Indexed as

TransfectionCell MembraneCell Membrane PermeabilityElasticityStress, Mechanical

Identifiers

PMID33977944
PMCPMC8204113

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.