Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33977823›Full record

ReviewClimacteric : the journal of the International Menopause Society2021

Menopause, hormone therapy and cognition: maximizing translation from preclinical research.

H A Bimonte-Nelson, V E Bernaud, S V Koebele

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Climacteric : the journal of the International Menopause Society, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. One size does not fit all: how type of menopause and hormone therapy matters for brain health.The British journal of psychiatry : the journal of mental science · 2025
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

H A Bimonte-NelsonDepartment of Psychology, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, USA.
V E BernaudDepartment of Psychology, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, USA.
S V KoebeleDepartment of Psychology, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, USA.

Funding

Research Education ComponentP30AG019610 · NIA · SUN HEALTH RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI REIMAN, ERIC MICHAEL · 2001 to 2020
$32.5M
Research Education ComponentP30AG072980 · NIA · BANNER HEALTH · PI Nicholas Ashton · 2021 to 2026
$24.9M
Variations in Hormone Therapy: Effects on Cognition and Markers of Brain AgingR01AG028084 · NIA · ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY-TEMPE CAMPUS · PI BIMONTE-NELSON, HEATHER ALLYSON · 2007 to 2022
$4.7M
Hysterectomy and Cognition: A Preclinical EvaluationF31AG056110 · NIA · ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY-TEMPE CAMPUS · PI KOEBELE, STEPHANIE VICTORIA · 2017 to 2018
$86k
Canadian Institute of Health Research WJP-150643NIA NIH HHS F31 AG056110NIA NIH HHS P30 AG019610NIA NIH HHS P30 AG072980NIA NIH HHS R01 AG028084
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Menopause-associated and hormone-associated cognitive research has a rich history built from varied disciplines and species. This review discusses landmark rodent and human work addressing cognitive outcomes associated with varied experiences of menopause and hormone therapy. Critical variables in menopause and cognitive aging research are considered, including menopause etiology, background hormone milieu and parameters of exposure to estrogens and progestogens. Recent preclinical research has identified that menopause and ovarian hormone fluctuations across many neurobiological systems affect cognitive aging, mapping novel avenues for future research. Preclinical models provide insight into complex interdisciplinary relationships in a systematic and highly controlled fashion. We highlight that acknowledging the strengths and weaknesses for both preclinical and clinical research approaches is vital to accurate interpretation, optimal translation and the direction of future research. There is great value in collaboration and communication across preclinical and clinical realms, especially regarding reciprocal feedback of findings to advance preclinical models, improve experimental designs and enrich basic science translation to the clinic. In searching for biological mechanisms underlying the cognitive consequences of menopause and hormone therapies, it is noteworthy that clinical and preclinical scientists are grounded in the same fundamental goal of optimizing health outcomes for women across the lifespan.

Indexed as

GeroscienceMenopauseCognitionFemaleHormonesHumansHormonesagingfemalehormone therapyhysterectomymemoryMenopauseovariectomyrat

Identifiers

PMID33977823
PMCPMC9124656

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.