Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33977675›Full record

ReviewWiley interdisciplinary reviews. Cognitive science2022

How we decide what to eat: Toward an interdisciplinary model of gut-brain interactions.

Hilke Plassmann, Daniela Stephanie Schelski, Marie-Christine Simon, Leonie Koban

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Cognitive science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Obesity - A Matter of Motivation?Experimental and clinical endocrinology & diabetes : official journal, German Society of Endocrinology [and] German Diabetes Association · 2022
    Review
  12. How we decide what to eat: Toward an interdisciplinary model of gut-brain interactions.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Cognitive science · 2022
    Review
  13. Serotonergic control of feeding microstructure inFrontiers in behavioral neuroscience · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Hilke PlassmannMarketing Area, INSEAD, Fontainebleau, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9680-0763
Daniela Stephanie SchelskiCenter for Economics and Neuroscience, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1541-0702
Marie-Christine SimonInstitute of Nutrition and Food Science (IEL), Nutrition and Microbiota, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Leonie KobanMarketing Area, INSEAD, Fontainebleau, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3121-6491

Funding

Agence National de la Recherche Tremplin ERC Cog 2020Diet-Body-Brain (DietBB) Competence Cluster in Nutrition Research funded by the Federal Ministry of Education and Research, Germany 01EA1809BGerman Federal Ministry of Education and Research FKZ01EA1707INSEAD's Research and Development Funds and Campus France (PRESTIGE/Marie-Sklodowska-Curie Fellowship) PRESTIGE-2018-2-0023
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Everyday dietary decisions have important short-term and long-term consequences for health and well-being. How do we decide what to eat, and what physiological and neurobiological systems are involved in those decisions? Here, we integrate findings from thus-far separate literatures: (a) the cognitive neuroscience of dietary decision-making, and (b) growing evidence of gut-brain interactions and especially influences of the gut microbiome on diet and health outcomes. We review findings that suggest that dietary decisions and food consumption influence nutrient sensing, homeostatic signaling in the gut, and the composition of the gut microbiome. In turn, the microbiome can influence host health and behavior. Through reward signaling pathways, the microbiome could potentially affect food and drink decisions. Such bidirectional links between gut microbiome and the brain systems underlying dietary decision-making may lead to self-reinforcing feedback loops that determine long-term dietary patterns, body mass, and health outcomes. This article is categorized under: Economics > Individual Decision-Making Psychology > Brain Function and Dysfunction Psychology > Reasoning and Decision Making.

Indexed as

Gastrointestinal MicrobiomeBrainHumansdietary decision-makinghomeostatic controlmicrobiota-gut-brain axisneural correlatesself-control

Identifiers

PMID33977675
PMCPMC9286667

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.