Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33977528›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of physiology2021

Analysis of waveform and amplitude of mouse rod and cone flash responses.

Annia Abtout, Gordon Fain, Jürgen Reingruber

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of physiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 44% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Reproducibility of the Rod Photoreceptor Response Depends Critically on the Concentration of the Phosphodiesterase Effector Enzyme.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Annia AbtoutInstitut de Biologie de l'École Normale Supérieure, Paris, France.
Gordon FainDepartment of Integrative Biology and Physiology, University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9813-0342
Jürgen ReingruberInstitut de Biologie de l'École Normale Supérieure, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0002-7167-8092
École Normale Supérieure - PSL · FRUniversity of California, Los Angeles · US

Funding

PHYSIOLOGY OF PHOTORECEPTORSR01EY001844 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI GORDON Lee FAIN · 1985 to 2026
$9.9M
TRANSPORT PROCESSES ACROSS THE CORNEAL EPITHELIUMR01EY003311 · NEI · LSU HEALTH SCIENCES CENTER · PI KLYCE, STEPHEN DOWNING · 1985 to 2006
$1.9M
PHYSIOLOGY OF PHOTORECEPTORSR37EY001844 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI FAIN, GORDON LEE · 1990 to 1999
–
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY001844NEI NIH HHS R01 EY003311NEI NIH HHS R37 EY001844
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

key pointsMost vertebrate eyes have rod and cone photoreceptors, which use a signal transduction pathway consisting of many biological processes to transform light into an electrical response. We dissect and quantify the contribution of each of these processes to the photoreceptor light response by using a novel method of analysis that provides an analytical solution for the entire time course of the dim-flash light response. We find that the shape of the light response is exclusively controlled by deactivation parameters. Activation parameters scale this shape and alter the response amplitude. We show that the rising phase of the response depends on Ca ABSTRACT: Vertebrate eyes have rod and cone photoreceptors, which use a complex transduction pathway comprising many biological processes to transform the absorption of light into an electrical response. A fundamental question in sensory transduction is how these processes contribute to the response. To study this question, we use a well-accepted phototransduction model, which we analyse with a novel method based on the log transform of the current. We derive an analytical solution that describes the entire time course of the photoreceptor response to dim flashes of light. We use this solution to dissect and quantify the contribution of each process to the response. We find that the entire dim-flash response is proportional to the flash intensity. By normalizing responses to unit amplitude, we define a waveform that is independent of the light intensity and characterizes the invariant shape of dim-flash responses. We show that this waveform is exclusively determined by deactivation rates; activation rates only scale the waveform and affect the amplitude. This analysis corrects a previous assumption that the rising phase is determined entirely by activation rates. We further show that the rising phase depends on Ca

Indexed as

Retinal Cone Photoreceptor CellsRetinal Rod Photoreceptor CellsAnimalsFeedbackMicePhotic StimulationSignal Transductionconemathematical modelphotoreceptorretinarodvision

Identifiers

PMID33977528
PMCPMC8259453
OpenAlexW3160483366

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.