ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2021
Probing RAS Function with Monobodies.
Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Inhibition and degradation of NRAS with a pan-NRAS monobody.Oncogene · 2024Article
- HSF1 at the crossroads of chemoresistance: from current insights to future horizons in cell death mechanisms.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2024Review
- Probing RAS Function Using Monobody and NanoBiT Technologies.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
RAS is frequently mutated in human cancers with nearly 20% of all cancers harboring mutations in one of three RAS isoforms (KRAS, HRAS, or NRAS). Furthermore, RAS proteins are critical oncogenic drivers of tumorigenesis. As such, RAS has been a prime focus for development of targeted cancer therapeutics. Although RAS is viewed by many as undruggable, the recent development of allele-specific covalent inhibitors to KRAS(G12C) has provided significant hope for the eventual pharmacological inhibition of RAS (Ostrem et al., Nature 503(7477):548-551, 2013; Patricelli et al., Cancer Discov 6(3):316-329, 2016; Janes et al., Cell 172(3):578-589.e17, 2018; Canon et al., Nature 575(7781):217-223, 2019; Hallin et al., Cancer Discov 10(1):54-71, 2020). Indeed, these (G12C)-specific inhibitors have elicited promising responses in early phase clinical trials (Canon et al., Nature 575(7781):217-223, 2019; Hallin et al., Cancer Discov 10(1):54-71, 2020). Despite this success in pharmacologically targeting KRAS(G12C), the remaining RAS mutants lack readily tractable chemistries for development of covalent inhibitors. Thus, alternative approaches are needed to develop broadly efficacious RAS inhibitors. We have utilized Monobody (Mb) technology to identify vulnerabilities in RAS that can potentially be exploited for development of novel RAS inhibitors. Here, we describe the methods used to isolate RAS-specific Mbs and to define their inhibitory activity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.