Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33977432›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental science and pollution research international2021

Treatment of mustard tuber wastewater (MTWW) using a pilot-scale packed cage rotating biological contactor system: process modeling and optimization.

Yang Dong, Youpeng Chen, Jinsong Guo, Jianhui Wang, Peng Yan, Wenjie Yin

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Yang DongKey Laboratory of Reservoir Aquatic Environment of CAS, Chongqing Institute of Green and Intelligent Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Chongqing, 400714, China.
Youpeng ChenKey Laboratory of the Three Gorges Reservoir Region's Eco-Environments of MOE, Chongqing University, Chongqing, 400045, China.
Jinsong GuoKey Laboratory of the Three Gorges Reservoir Region's Eco-Environments of MOE, Chongqing University, Chongqing, 400045, China. guo0768@cqu.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2417-473X
Jianhui WangNational Base of International Science and Technology Cooperation for Intelligent Manufacturing Service, Chongqing Technology and Business University, Chongqing, 400067, China.
Peng YanKey Laboratory of the Three Gorges Reservoir Region's Eco-Environments of MOE, Chongqing University, Chongqing, 400045, China.
Wenjie YinNational Base of International Science and Technology Cooperation for Intelligent Manufacturing Service, Chongqing Technology and Business University, Chongqing, 400067, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The water quality range for wastewater treatment projects in the food processing industry changes constantly. To fully understand the threshold for pollutant removal with the lowest possible energy consumption, the relationship between pollutant removal and wastewater treatment conditions was established using response surface methodology (RSM). The optimum conditions for total COD, TN, and NH

Indexed as

WastewaterWater PurificationBioreactorsFood-Processing IndustryMustard PlantNitrogenWaste Disposal, FluidNitrogenWastewaterBiofilmBiological nutrients removalDisks rotating speedEnergy assessmentRemoval maximumResponse surface methodology

Identifiers

PMID33977432

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.