Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33977288›Full record

ReviewFaculty reviews2021

Recent advances in understanding chronic myeloid leukemia: where do we stand?

Rahul Kumar, Daniela S Krause

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Faculty reviews, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. PRMT1 Promotes the Self-renewal of Leukemia Stem Cells by Regulating Protein Synthesis.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Potential ApproachesFrontiers in oncology · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Rahul KumarGeorg-Speyer-Haus, Institute for Tumor Biology and Experimental Therapy, 60596 Frankfurt, Germany.
Daniela S KrauseGeorg-Speyer-Haus, Institute for Tumor Biology and Experimental Therapy, 60596 Frankfurt, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3603-1119

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While the need for complete eradication of leukemic stem cells (LSCs) in chronic myeloid leukemia may be controversial, it is agreed that remaining LSCs are the cause of relapse and disease progression. Current efforts are focused on the understanding of the persistence of immunophenotypically defined LSCs, which feature abnormalities in signaling pathways relating to autophagy, metabolism, epigenetics, and others and are influenced by leukemia cell-extrinsic factors such as the immune and bone marrow microenvironments. In sum, these elements modulate response and resistance to therapies and the clinical condition of treatment-free remission (TFR), the newly established goal in CML treatment, once the patient has achieved a durable molecular remission after treatment with tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Novel combination therapies based on these identified vulnerabilities of LSCs, aimed at the induction or maintenance of TFR, are being developed, while other research is directed at the elucidation of factors mediating progression to blast crisis.

Indexed as

autophagybone marrow microenvironmentChronic myeloid leukemiaepigeneticsimmunological factorsmetabolismtreatment-free remission

Identifiers

PMID33977288
PMCPMC8103906

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.