Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33977227›Full record

ArticleJNCI cancer spectrum2021

Characterization of Oligometastatic Disease in a Real-World Nationwide Cohort of 3447 Patients With de Novo Metastatic Breast Cancer.

Tessa G Steenbruggen, Michael Schaapveld, Hugo M Horlings, Joyce Sanders, Sander J Hogewoning, Esther H Lips, Marie-Jeanne T Vrancken Peeters, Niels F Kok, Terry Wiersma, Laura Esserman and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JNCI cancer spectrum, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Setting the Stage for Cancer: Stay Soft and Optimistic.The Yale journal of biology and medicine · 2024
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. HRDrugs in context · 2023
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Tessa G SteenbruggenDepartment of Medical Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-6870-5785
Michael SchaapveldDepartment of Epidemiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-4390-7182
Hugo M HorlingsDepartment of Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-4782-8828
Joyce SandersDepartment of Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-0551-7813
Sander J HogewoningDepartment of Research and Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation, Utrecht, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-6514-7754
Esther H LipsDepartment of Molecular Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-3488-4935
Marie-Jeanne T Vrancken PeetersDepartment of Surgical Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Niels F KokDepartment of Surgical Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Terry WiersmaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-8808-7005
Laura EssermanDepartment of Surgical Oncology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9202-4568
Laura J van 't VeerDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Sabine C LinnDepartment of Medical Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-5541-0347
Sabine SieslingDepartment of Research and Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation, Utrecht, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-0273-824X
Gabe S SonkeDepartment of Medical Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-8088-9628
The Netherlands Cancer Institute · NLNetherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation · NLUniversity of California, San Francisco · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Observational studies in metastatic breast cancer (MBC) show that long-term overall survival (OS) is associated with limited tumor burden, or oligo-MBC (OMBC). However, a uniform definition of OMBC is lacking. In this real-world nationwide cohort, we aimed to define the optimal OMBC threshold and factors associated with survival in patients with OMBC. Methods: 3535 patients aged younger than 80 years at diagnosis of de novo MBC in the Netherlands between January 2000 and December 2007 were included. Detailed clinical, therapy, and outcome data were collected from medical records of a sample of the patients. Using inverse-sampling-probability weighting, the analysis cohort (n = 3447) was constructed. We assessed OS according to number of metastases at diagnosis to determine the optimal OMBC threshold. Next, we applied Cox regression models with inverse-sampling-probability weighting to study associations with OS and progression-free survival in OMBC. All statistical tests were 2-sided. Results: Compared with more than 5 distant metastases, adjusted hazard ratios for OS (with 95% confidence interval [CI] based on robust standard errors) for 1, 2-3, and 4-5 metastases were 0.70 (95% CI = 0.52 to 0.96), 0.63 (95% CI = 0.45 to 0.89), and 0.91 (95% CI = 0.61 to 1.37), respectively. Ten-year OS estimates for patients with no more than 3 vs more than 3 metastases were 14.9% and 3.4% ( Conclusion: OMBC defined as MBC limited to 1-3 metastases was associated with favorable OS. In OMBC, local therapy of metastases was associated with better OS, particularly if patients were premenopausal or perimenopausal without lung metastases.

Indexed as

Tumor BurdenAgedBreast NeoplasmsCohort StudiesConfidence IntervalsFemaleHumansIncidenceLung NeoplasmsNeoplasm MetastasisNetherlandsPerimenopausePremenopauseProgression-Free SurvivalProportional Hazards Models

Identifiers

PMID33977227
PMCPMC8099998
OpenAlexW3128619662

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.