Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33977163›Full record

ArticleHealth science reports2021

The role of family confidants and caregivers in the care of older cancer patients: Extending the concept of "shared decision-making".

Frank Gieseler, Andreas Heidenreich, Jacqueline Schubert, Fabian Frielitz, Christoph Rehmann-Sutter, Frank Wörler, Christina Schües, Joachim Hübner, Susanne Elsner, Katarina Block and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health science reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Physicians' perspectives on family caregivers' roles in elderly cancer patients' therapies: a qualitative, interview-based study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Frank GieselerClinic for Hematology and Oncology University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein (UKSH) Luebeck Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6409-3822
Andreas HeidenreichInstitute for Social Medicine and Epidemiology, University of Luebeck Luebeck Germany.
Jacqueline SchubertClinic for Hematology and Oncology University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein (UKSH) Luebeck Germany.
Fabian FrielitzInstitute for Social Medicine and Epidemiology, University of Luebeck Luebeck Germany.
Christoph Rehmann-SutterInstitute for History of Medicine and Science Studies, University of Luebeck Luebeck Germany.
Frank WörlerInstitute for History of Medicine and Science Studies, University of Luebeck Luebeck Germany.
Christina SchüesInstitute for History of Medicine and Science Studies, University of Luebeck Luebeck Germany.
Joachim HübnerInstitute for Social Medicine and Epidemiology, University of Luebeck Luebeck Germany.
Susanne ElsnerInstitute for Social Medicine and Epidemiology, University of Luebeck Luebeck Germany.
Katarina BlockInstitute for Social Medicine and Epidemiology, University of Luebeck Luebeck Germany.
Achim RodyClinic for Gynecology University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein (UKSH) Luebeck Germany.
Nikolas von BubnoffClinic for Hematology and Oncology University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein (UKSH) Luebeck Germany.
Tobias KeckClinic for Surgery University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein (UKSH) Luebeck Germany.
Monika SteimannStrandklinik Ostseebad Boltenhagen Ostseebad Boltenhagen Germany.
Gero EndsinVAMED, Rehaklinik Lehmrade Lehmrade Germany.
Alexander KatalinicInstitute for Social Medicine and Epidemiology, University of Luebeck Luebeck Germany.
Institute for Integrative and Experimental Genomics · DEUniversity Hospital Schleswig-Holstein · DEOstalb-Klinikum Aalen · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimsFamily caregivers play an important role in assisting their family members with cancer, but their influence on the treatment decision-making process has not yet been adequately investigated. This exploratory study approached this topic via reconstructive methodology, focusing on assessing patient-caregiver relationships.

methodsWe conducted semi-structured interviews with 37 mostly elderly cancer patients (median age: 74 years) about the context of their diagnosis, treatment decision, and family support. Additionally, we interviewed 34 caregivers of cancer patients. Of these, 25 were related to patients interviewed. We analyzed the interviews via a multi-step coding method informed by Grounded Theory methodology toward characterizing patient-caregiver relationships, the treatment decision-making process, and the caregivers' role therein.

resultsIn the majority of cases (86%), patients were being supported by caregivers. We categorized patient-caregiver relationships in regards to the caregivers' involvement in the therapy decision-making process. We found patient-caregiver interaction patterns that indicate the potential of caregivers to decidedly influence the therapy decision-making process. Yet, only in 38% of cases, a caregiver attended relevant patient-physician-consultations.

conclusionDepending on the nature of the patient-caregiver relationship, the traditional concept of shared decision-making, which assumes a dyadic relationship, needs to be extended toward a more dynamic concept in which caregivers should be involved more frequently. This could enable physicians to better understand a patient's reasons for or against a therapy proposal and ensure that the patient's wishes are communicated and considered. On the other hand, strong caregiver-involvement bears risks of over-stepping elderly patients' wishes, thus violating patient autonomy.

Indexed as

familyolder cancer patientsqualitative research methodsquality of lifesurvivorship

Identifiers

PMID33977163
PMCPMC8100949
OpenAlexW3162307179

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.