Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33977083›Full record

ArticleAnnals of global health2021

Sustainability Assessment of a District-Wide Quality Improvement on Newborn Care Program in Rural Rwanda: A Mixed-Method Study.

Evrard Nahimana, Hema Magge, Francois Bizimana, Merab Nyishime, Christina Thompson Lively, Hannah Gilbert, Bethany Hedt Gauthier, Felix Sayinzoga, Fulgence Nkikabahizi, Lisa R Hirschhorn

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of global health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Evrard NahimanaPartners In Health/Inshuti Mu Buzima, Kigali, Rwanda.ORCID 0000-0002-8437-3044
Hema MaggeBill and Melinda Gates Foundation, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8582-5970
Francois BizimanaPartners In Health/Inshuti Mu Buzima, Kigali, Rwanda.
Merab NyishimePartners In Health/Inshuti Mu Buzima, Kigali, Rwanda.ORCID 0000-0002-1835-286X
Christina Thompson LivelyDepartment of Global Health and Social Medicine, Harvard Medical School, USA.
Hannah GilbertDepartment of Global Health and Social Medicine, Harvard Medical School, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5965-0460
Bethany Hedt GauthierDepartment of Global Health and Social Medicine, Harvard Medical School, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9689-5413
Felix SayinzogaRwanda Biomedical Center, Kigali, Rwanda.ORCID 0000-0002-5627-3185
Fulgence NkikabahiziKinihira Hospital, Rwanda Ministry of Health, Kigali, Rwanda.
Lisa R HirschhornNorthwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4355-7437

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Neonatal mortality continues to be a global challenge, particularly in low- and middle-income countries. There is growing work to reduce mortality through improving quality of systems and care, but less is known about sustainability of improvements in the setting post initial implementation. We conducted a 12-month sustainability assessment of All Babies Count (ABC), a district-wide quality improvement project including mentoring and improvement collaborative designed to improve quality and reduce neonatal mortality in two districts in rural Rwanda. Methods: We measured changes in key neonatal process, coverage, and outcome indicators between the completion of ABC implementation and 12 months after the completion. In addition, we conducted 4 focus group discussions and 15 individual in-depth interviews with health providers and facility and district leaders to understand factors that influenced sustainability of improvements. We used an inductive, content analytic approach to derive six themes related to the ABC sustainability to explain quantitative results. Findings: Twelve months after the completion of ABC implementation, we found continued improvements in core quality, coverage, and neonatal outcomes. During ABC, the percentage of women with 4 antenatal visits increased from 12% to 30% and remained stable 12 months post-ABC (30%, p = 0.7) with an increase in facility-based delivery from 92.6% at the end of ABC to 95.8% (p = 0.01) at 12-month post-ABC. During ABC intervention, the 2 districts decreased neonatal mortality from 30.1 to 19.4 deaths per 1,000 live births with maintenance of the lower mortality 12 months post-ABC (19.4 deaths per 1,000 live births, p = 0.7). Leadership buy-in and development of self-reliance encouraging internally generated solutions emerged as key factors to sustain improvements while staff turnover, famine, influx of refugees, and unintended consequences of new national newborn care policies threatened sustainability. Interpretation: Despite discontinuity of key ABC support, health facilities kept the momentum of good practices and were able to maintain or increase the level of prenatal, neonatal quality of care and outcomes over a period of 12 months following the end of initial ABC implementation. Additional studies are needed to determine the longer-term sustainability beyond one year.

Indexed as

Infant CareInfant MortalityQuality ImprovementRural Health ServicesFemaleFocus GroupsFollow-Up StudiesHumansInfantInfant, NewbornPregnancyProgram EvaluationQualitative ResearchRwanda

Identifiers

PMID33977083
PMCPMC8064291

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.