Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33977033›Full record

ArticleJIMD reports2021

Uptake of moss-derived human recombinant GAA in

Stefan Hintze, Paulina Dabrowska-Schlepp, Birgit Berg, Alexandra Graupner, Andreas Busch, Andreas Schaaf, Benedikt Schoser, Peter Meinke

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JIMD reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 39% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. The advent of plant cells in bioreactors.Frontiers in plant science · 2023
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Stefan HintzeFriedrich-Baur-Institute at the Department of Neurology University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich Munich Germany.
Paulina Dabrowska-Schleppeleva GmbH Freiburg Germany.
Birgit Bergeleva GmbH Freiburg Germany.
Alexandra GraupnerFriedrich-Baur-Institute at the Department of Neurology University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich Munich Germany.
Andreas Buscheleva GmbH Freiburg Germany.
Andreas Schaafeleva GmbH Freiburg Germany.
Benedikt SchoserFriedrich-Baur-Institute at the Department of Neurology University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich Munich Germany.
Peter MeinkeFriedrich-Baur-Institute at the Department of Neurology University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich Munich Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3359-3837
Friedrich Baur Stiftung · DEUniversity of Education Freiburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pompe disease, an autosomal recessive lysosomal storage disorder, is caused by deficiency of lysosomal acid alpha-glucosidase (GAA). On cellular level, there is lysosomal-bound and free accumulation of glycogen and subsequent damage of organelles and organs. The most severe affected tissues are skeletal muscles and heart. The only available treatment to date is an enzyme replacement therapy (ERT) with alglucosidase alfa, a recombinant human GAA (rhGAA) modified with mannose-6-phosphate (M6P), which is internalized via M6P-mediated endocytosis. There is an unmet need to improve this type of therapy, especially in regard to skeletal muscle. Using different tissue culture models, we recently provided evidence that a moss-derived nonphosphorylated rhGAA (moss-GAA), carrying a glycosylation with terminal

Indexed as

enzyme replacement therapyglycogen storage disease type IImoss‐GAAPompe disease

Identifiers

PMID33977033
PMCPMC8100399
OpenAlexW3126167584

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.