ReviewCureus2021
Antimicrobial Stewardship: A Review for Internal Medicine Physicians.
Review in Cureus, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Review article: the future of microbiome-based therapeutics.Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics · 2022Review
- Polish Medical Doctors' Opinions on Available Resources and Information Campaigns concerning Antibiotics and Antibiotic Resistance, a Cross-Sectional Study.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Economic Evaluation of FebriDx®: A Novel Rapid, Point-of-Care Test for Differentiation of Viral versus Bacterial Acute Respiratory Infection in the United States.Journal of health economics and outcomes research · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Antimicrobial stewardship is the need of the hour to prevent the collapse of our health care system at the hands of a pandemic of resistant pathogens. Inappropriate and indiscriminate abuse of antibiotics has left very few options for prescribing physicians as most of the pathogens, particularly gram-negative, are resistant to the major antibiotics. This article reviews the importance of Antimicrobial Stewardship Programs (ASP) for internal medicine physicians and residents. Commonly encountered clinical scenarios are discussed. Appropriate indications of antibiotics, pathogen-guided prescriptions, adverse effects of common antibiotics, and options to use newer antibiotics are reviewed. The role of a health care team is highlighted. The evidence-based steps taken to ensure ASPs implementation are reiterated to serve as an educational guide for medical residents and physicians.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.