Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33976962›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2021

Epidemiology of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) on California dairies: descriptive and cluster analyses of AMR phenotype of fecal commensal bacteria isolated from adult cows.

Essam M Abdelfattah, Pius S Ekong, Emmanuel Okello, Tapakorn Chamchoy, Betsy M Karle, Randi A Black, David Sheedy, Wagdy R ElAshmawy, Deniece R Williams, Daniela Califano and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Genomic analysis of multidrug-resistantFrontiers in microbiology · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Prevalence of antimicrobial resistance in fecalFrontiers in microbiology · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Essam M AbdelfattahVeterinary Medicine Teaching and Research Center, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California, Davis, Tulare, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7267-8406
Pius S EkongVeterinary Medicine Teaching and Research Center, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California, Davis, Tulare, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1936-9425
Emmanuel OkelloVeterinary Medicine Teaching and Research Center, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California, Davis, Tulare, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1746-8385
Tapakorn ChamchoyVeterinary Medicine Teaching and Research Center, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California, Davis, Tulare, CA, USA.
Betsy M KarleCooperative Extension, Division of Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of California, Davis, Orland, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1851-5427
Randi A BlackCooperative Extension, Division of Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of California, Davis, Santa Rosa, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0724-6658
David SheedyVeterinary Medicine Teaching and Research Center, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California, Davis, Tulare, CA, USA.
Wagdy R ElAshmawyVeterinary Medicine Teaching and Research Center, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California, Davis, Tulare, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6466-1455
Deniece R WilliamsVeterinary Medicine Teaching and Research Center, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California, Davis, Tulare, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7534-732X
Daniela CalifanoVeterinary Medicine Teaching and Research Center, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California, Davis, Tulare, CA, USA.
Luis Fernando Durán TovarVeterinary Medicine Teaching and Research Center, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California, Davis, Tulare, CA, USA.
Jonathan OngomVeterinary Medicine Teaching and Research Center, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California, Davis, Tulare, CA, USA.
Terry W LehenbauerVeterinary Medicine Teaching and Research Center, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California, Davis, Tulare, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0896-3939
Barbara A ByrneDepartment of Pathology, Microbiology, and Immunology, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8907-1272
Sharif S AlyVeterinary Medicine Teaching and Research Center, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California, Davis, Tulare, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0330-5013
University of California, Davis · USUniversity of California Division of Agriculture and Natural Resources · USBenha University · EGCairo University · EGNational Veterinary Research Institute · NG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis study describes the occurrence of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) in commensal

methodsThe study was conducted on ten dairies distributed across CA's three milk sheds: Northern California (NCA), Northern San Joaquin Valley (NSJV), and the Greater Southern California (GSCA). On each study dairy, individual fecal samples were collected from two cohorts of lactating dairy cows during the fall/winter 2018 and spring/summer 2019 seasons. Each cohort comprised of 12 cows per dairy. The fecal samples were collected at enrollment before calving (close-up stage) and then monthly thereafter for four consecutive time points up to 120 days in milk. A total of 2,171

resultsThe

conclusionsOur findings showed high rates of AMR to several drugs that are not labeled for use in lactating dairy cattle 20 months of age or older. Conversely, very low resistance was observed for drugs labeled for use in adult dairy cows, such as cephalosporins and penicillin. Overall, our findings identified important differences in AMR by antimicrobial class, region and season.

Indexed as

Antimicrobial resistanceCaliforniaCohort studyDairy cattleEnterococcus sppEscherichia coliMultidrug resistancePhenotypeRegionSeason

Identifiers

PMID33976962
PMCPMC8063881
OpenAlexW3155529297

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.