Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33976941›Full record

ArticleEmergency medicine international2021

Availability of Emergency Department Wait Times Information: A Patient-Centered Needs Assessment.

Samantha Calder-Sprackman, Edmund S H Kwok, Renee Bradley, Jeffrey Landreville, Jeffrey J Perry, Lisa A Calder

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Emergency medicine international, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Characterizing Spanish-speaking patients' patient-centered care experiences in the emergency department.Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Samantha Calder-SprackmanDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8582-9077
Edmund S H KwokDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2339-1019
Renee BradleyDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0316-5858
Jeffrey LandrevilleDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3095-6244
Jeffrey J PerryDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2134-9597
Lisa A CalderDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8134-9391

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionMany Emergency Departments (ED) publish wait times; however, the patient perspective in what information is requested and the quantity of information to post is limited.

methodsWe conducted a mixed-methods study at a tertiary care academic center. First, we conducted focus groups of 7 patients. We then generated themes following content analysis to create a patient survey. We administered in-person surveys to patients in ED waiting rooms at sites randomized for survey administration. We used preassigned shifts utilized for even patient perspective representation of the 24 hours-a-day/7 days-a-week service. We included waiting room patients over 18 years of age and excluded patients directly referred to a specialty service or who did not speak French or English. We analyzed survey data using descriptive statistics.

resultsWe identified nine dominant focus group themes: wait time definition, wait time notification, communication, education, patient expectations, utilization of the ED, patient behaviour, physical comfort, and patient empowerment. Of the 240 patient questionnaires administered, 81.3% of respondents wanted to know ED wait times before hospital arrival hospital and 90.8% wanted ED wait times posted in the waiting room. Website (46.7%) was the most popular choice for publishing wait times outside the ED. Within the ED, patients had no preference regarding display modality, if times were displayed (39.6%). Overall, 76.7% stated that their satisfaction with the ED would be improved if wait times were posted.

conclusionED patients strongly supported having access to wait time information. Patients believed having wait time information will have a positive impact on their overall ED satisfaction.

Identifiers

PMID33976941
PMCPMC8084678

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.