ArticleCentral European journal of urology2021
Evaluation of the sensitivity of different doses of vasoactive drugs in diagnosing erectile dysfunction in impotent patients: a prospective case-control study.
Article in Central European journal of urology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Phytochemical-based nanomedicine as a promising therapeutic strategy for erectile dysfunction.Asian journal of andrology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionErectile dysfunction (ED) is one of the most common sexual disorders worldwide affecting about 30 million men in the United States, and an estimated 100 million men worldwide. Penile duplex doppler ultrasound (PDDU) is performed using an intracavernosal injection (ICI) of a vasoactive agent to demonstrate both arterial insufficiency and veno-occlusive dysfunction. This article aims to evaluate the sensitivity of different doses of different vasoactive agents used to diagnose ED in impotent patients. MATERIAL AND
methodsThis study recruited 90 subjects with ED and 100 healthy subjects as controls. All of the subjects were assessed using the International Index of Erectile Function score (IIEF-5) while degree of erection was assessed by the Erection Hardness Score (EHS). Two penile duplex tests were done for each candidate two weeks apart.
resultsNone of the sample population achieved a normal clinical response (EHS >2) to 10 ug PGE1. In contrast, 60 controls (60%) had a normal response (EHS >2) to 10 ug PGE1. This difference in response between the sample and control populations to 10 ug PGE1 was of high statistical significance 11 (p <0.001). In contrast, 54 (60%) out of the 90 cases had normal clinical response (EHS >2) to 0.25cc Trimix (everywhere). Interestingly, 96 controls (96%) demonstrated normal response (EHS >2) to 0.25cc Trimix. This difference in response between the sample and control populations to 0.25 cc Trimix was also of high statistical significance (p <0.001).
conclusionsOur study demonstrated a statistically significant association between the response to Trimix over PGE1 and peak systolic velocity (PSV) and end diastolic velocity (EDV). Thus, we conclude that 0.25 cc Trimix is more sensitive than 20 ug PGE1 in diagnosing ED for impotent patients and also provides a more potent response.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.