ArticleCentral European journal of urology2021
Erectile function in SRY positive 46,XX males with normal phenotype.
Article in Central European journal of urology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Long-term outcomes in non-CAH 46,XX DSD.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2024Review
- A 46,XX Karyotype in Men with Infertility: Two New Cases and Review of the Literature.Journal of human reproductive sciencesArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe 46,XX male syndrome is a rare disorder of sex development and has two different forms, depending on the sex-determining region's presence on the Y chromosome (SRY) gene. The SRY positive 46,XX males are usually diagnosed during infertility workup. We evaluated the erectile function of 46,XX SRY positive males and compared it with healthy males. MATERIAL AND
methodsTen patients with azoospermia and 46,XX SRY positive disorder who referred to a urology clinic with infertility were analyzed retrospectively. Controls were chosen from healthy males at similar ages. The physical examination was performed, and serum hormones were obtained at admission. The clinical assessment of erectile dysfunction was evaluated by the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) questionnaire.
resultsThere was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in terms of age, serum prolactin, luteinizing hormone (LH) levels and IIEF scores (P >0.05). In 46,XX males, serum follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) levels were significantly higher, and total testosterone levels and testicular volumes were found to be significantly lower when compared to controls (p <0.001, p <0.05, p <0.01, respectively).
conclusionsThis study indicates that these males' erectile function is similar to those of 46,XY males.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.