Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33976913›Full record

ArticleCentral European journal of urology2021

Contemporary analysis of epididymal tumors using a national database.

Rohit Bhatt, Facundo Davaro, Ryan Wong, Sameer Siddiqui, Leslie Hinyard, Zachary Hamilton

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Central European journal of urology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Targeting mutantUrology case reports · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Rohit BhattSaint Louis University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, United States.
Facundo DavaroDivision of Urology, Department of Surgery, Saint Louis University, St. Louis, MO, United States.
Ryan WongSaint Louis University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, United States.
Sameer SiddiquiDivision of Urology, Department of Surgery, Saint Louis University, St. Louis, MO, United States.
Leslie HinyardAdvanced Health Data Institute, Department of Health and Clinical Outcomes Research, Saint Louis University, St. Louis, MO, United States.
Zachary HamiltonDivision of Urology, Department of Surgery, Saint Louis University, St. Louis, MO, United States.
Saint Louis University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionEpididymal tumors are rare malignancies with sparse research available to guide recommendations. We sought to characterize malignant epididymal tumors in the United States using population level data. MATERIAL AND

methodsThe Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End-Results database was queried for patients diagnosed with malignant epididymal tumors between 1975-2016. International classification of disease for oncology code C63.0 was used to identify population with disease of interest. Primary objective was to characterize patient demographics, disease characteristics, and management. Secondary objectives included overall and cancer-specific survival (CSS) utilizing Kaplan-Meier (KM) analysis.

resultsA total of 66 cases of malignant epididymal tumors were identified during the study period. The cohort was largely white (84.8%), with a mean age of diagnosis of 46.9 years old. The predominant histology consisted of rhabdomyosarcoma 26%, leiomyosarcoma 23%, liposarcoma 17%, adenocarcinoma 9%, and malignant fibrous histiocytoma 5%. During histopathological assessment, 21.1% of tumors were classified as high-grade while 71.2% exhibited sarcomatoid elements. Majority of patients presented with localized disease (68.2%), whereas regional (18.2%) and distant (13.2%) disease was less frequently discovered. All patients were diagnosed by surgical therapy consisting of radical epididymectomy (39.4%), partial epididymectomy (27.3%) or 'unknown surgery' (33.3%). Meanwhile, 15.2% and 34.8% received radiation and chemotherapy, respectively. KM analysis revealed an 84.9% CSS at 5-years. Over 60% of documented cases have arisen since 2000, with 3.0% of the cohort diagnosed in 2016, increased from 1.5% of the diagnoses in 1975.

conclusionsMalignant epididymal tumors are exceedingly rare and typically present with localized disease. Surgical excision is associated with an estimated 85% CSS at 5-years.

Indexed as

clinical practice patternepididymissarcomasurvival

Identifiers

PMID33976913
PMCPMC8097649
OpenAlexW3162584778

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.