Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33976805›Full record

ArticleEcology and evolution2021

Who let the dogs out? Exploring the spatial ecology of free-roaming domestic dogs in western Kenya.

Patrick Muinde, Judy M Bettridge, Filipe M Sousa, Salome Dürr, Ian R Dohoo, John Berezowski, Titus Mutwiri, Christian O Odinga, Eric M Fèvre, Laura C Falzon

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecology and evolution, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Canine contact networks: A survey-based study of dog contacts and activities.The Canadian veterinary journal = La revue veterinaire canadienne · 2025
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. You AreAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Are Tourists Facilitators of the Movement of Free-Ranging Dogs?Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Epidemiological Study of the Occurrence of Typhus GroupAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Patrick MuindeInternational Livestock Research Institute Nairobi Kenya.
Judy M BettridgeInternational Livestock Research Institute Nairobi Kenya.
Filipe M SousaVeterinary Public Health Institute University of Bern Bern Switzerland.
Salome DürrVeterinary Public Health Institute University of Bern Bern Switzerland.
Ian R DohooAtlantic Veterinary College University of Prince Edward Island Charlottetown Canada.
John BerezowskiVeterinary Public Health Institute University of Bern Bern Switzerland.
Titus MutwiriInternational Livestock Research Institute Nairobi Kenya.
Christian O OdingaInternational Livestock Research Institute Nairobi Kenya.
Eric M FèvreInternational Livestock Research Institute Nairobi Kenya.
Laura C FalzonInternational Livestock Research Institute Nairobi Kenya.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4043-1644
University of Bern · CHUniversity of Liverpool · GBInternational Livestock Research Institute · KEJomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology · KEUniversity of Prince Edward Island · CA

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/L019019/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The spatial ecology of free-roaming dogs determines their role in the transmission of zoonoses. This study describes the geographic range of and identifies sites frequently visited by free-roaming domestic dogs in western Kenya. Eight sites in Busia county, western Kenya, were selected. At each site, ten dog-keeping households were recruited, a questionnaire was administered, and a GPS logger was fixed around the neck of one dog in each household. Loggers were programmed to capture the dog's position every minute, for five consecutive days. Individual summaries of GPS recordings were produced, and the daily distance traveled was calculated. 50% and 95% utilization distribution isopleths were produced, and the area within these isopleths was extracted to estimate the size of the core and extended Home Ranges (HRs), respectively. Linear regression analyses were performed to identify factors associated with the movement parameters. The centroid points of the 10, 50, and 90% isopleths were reproduced, and the corresponding sites identified on the ground. Seventy-three dogs were included in the final analyses. The median daily distance traveled was 13.5km, while the median core and extended HRs were 0.4 and 9.3 ha, respectively. Older dogs had a larger extended HR and traveled more daily, while the effect of sex on dog movement depended on their neutering status. Dogs spent most of their time at their household; other frequently visited sites included other household compounds, fields, and rubbish dumps. One of the centroids corresponded to a field located across the international Kenya-Uganda border, emphasizing the fluidity across the border in this ecosystem. Multiple dogs visited the same location, highlighting the heterogeneous contact networks between dogs, and between dogs and people. The field data presented are of value both in understanding domestic dog ecology and resource utilization, and in contextualizing infectious and parasitic disease transmission models.

Indexed as

Canis lupus familiarisHabitat UtilizationHome RangeKenyaRoaming behaviorUtilization DistributionZoonoses

Identifiers

PMID33976805
PMCPMC8093722
OpenAlexW3138682093

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.