Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33976790›Full record

ArticleEcology and evolution2021

Assessing invertebrate herbivory in human-modified tropical forest canopies.

Julia Rodrigues Barreto, Erika Berenguer, Joice Ferreira, Carlos A Joly, Yadvinder Malhi, Marina Maria Moraes de Seixas, Jos Barlow

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecology and evolution, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Julia Rodrigues BarretoSetor de Ecologia e Conservação Universidade Federal de Lavras Lavras Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3182-200X
Erika BerenguerSchool of Geography and the Environment Environmental Change Institute University of Oxford Oxford UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8157-8792
Joice FerreiraEmbrapa Amazônia Oriental Belém Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4008-2341
Carlos A JolyDepartamento de Biologia Vegetal Instituto de Biologia Universidade Estadual de Campinas Campinas Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7945-2805
Yadvinder MalhiSchool of Geography and the Environment Environmental Change Institute University of Oxford Oxford UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3503-4783
Marina Maria Moraes de SeixasEmbrapa Amazônia Oriental Belém Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6421-3131
Jos BarlowSetor de Ecologia e Conservação Universidade Federal de Lavras Lavras Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4992-2594
Universidade Federal de Lavras · BRUniversity of Oxford · GBUniversidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Studies on the effects of human-driven forest disturbance usually focus on either biodiversity or carbon dynamics but much less is known about ecosystem processes that span different trophic levels. Herbivory is a fundamental ecological process for ecosystem functioning, but it remains poorly quantified in human-modified tropical rainforests.Here, we present the results of the largest study to date on the impacts of human disturbances on herbivory. We quantified the incidence (percentage of leaves affected) and severity (the percentage of leaf area lost) of canopy insect herbivory caused by chewers, miners, and gall makers in leaves from 1,076 trees distributed across 20 undisturbed and human-modified forest plots in the Amazon.We found that chewers dominated herbivory incidence, yet were not a good predictor of the other forms of herbivory at either the stem or plot level. Chewing severity was higher in both logged and logged-and-burned primary forests when compared to undisturbed forests. We found no difference in herbivory severity between undisturbed primary forests and secondary forests. Despite evidence at the stem level, neither plot-level incidence nor severity of the three forms of herbivory responded to disturbance.

Indexed as

Amazon rainforestbiodiversity and ecosystem functioningenvironmental gradientfolivoryforest degradationherbivore interactionsherbivoryplanttropical forest

Identifiers

PMID33976790
PMCPMC8093672
OpenAlexW3150111288

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.