Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33976773›Full record

ReviewEcology and evolution2021

Tackling unresolved questions in forest ecology: The past and future role of simulation models.

Isabelle Maréchaux, Fanny Langerwisch, Andreas Huth, Harald Bugmann, Xavier Morin, Christopher P O Reyer, Rupert Seidl, Alessio Collalti, Mateus Dantas de Paula, Rico Fischer and 10 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Ecology and evolution, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Isabelle MaréchauxINRAE CIRAD CNRS AMAP Univ Montpellier Montpellier France.
Fanny LangerwischDepartment of Ecology and Environmental Sciences Palacký University Olomouc Olomouc Czech Republic.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4744-7427
Andreas HuthHelmholtz Centre for Environmental Research - UFZ Leipzig Germany.
Harald BugmannForest Ecology Institute of Terrestrial Ecosystems ETH Zürich Zurich Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4233-0094
Xavier MorinEPHE CEFE CNRS Univ Montpellier Univ Paul Valéry Montpellier IRD Montpellier France.
Christopher P O ReyerPotsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (PIK) Member of the Leibniz Association Potsdam Germany.
Rupert SeidlInstitute of Silviculture University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences (BOKU) Vienna Austria.
Alessio CollaltiForest Modelling Lab Institute for Agriculture and Forestry Systems in the Mediterranean National Research Council of Italy (CNR-ISAFOM) Perugia (PG) Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4980-8487
Mateus Dantas de PaulaSBiK-F - Senckenberg Biodiversity and Climate Research Centre Frankfurt am Main Germany.
Rico FischerHelmholtz Centre for Environmental Research - UFZ Leipzig Germany.
Martin GutschPotsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (PIK) Member of the Leibniz Association Potsdam Germany.
Manfred J LexerUniversity of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Vienna Austria.
Heike LischkeDynamic Macroecology Land Change Science Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research WSL Birmensdorf Switzerland.
Anja RammigTUM School of Life Sciences Technical University of Munich Freising Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5425-8718
Edna RödigHelmholtz Centre for Environmental Research - UFZ Leipzig Germany.
Boris SakschewskiPotsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (PIK) Member of the Leibniz Association Potsdam Germany.
Franziska TaubertHelmholtz Centre for Environmental Research - UFZ Leipzig Germany.
Kirsten ThonickePotsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (PIK) Member of the Leibniz Association Potsdam Germany.
Giorgio VacchianoDISAA Università degli Studi di Milano Milano Italy.
Friedrich J BohnHelmholtz Centre for Environmental Research - UFZ Leipzig Germany.

Funding

Austrian Science Fund FWF Y 895
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding the processes that shape forest functioning, structure, and diversity remains challenging, although data on forest systems are being collected at a rapid pace and across scales. Forest models have a long history in bridging data with ecological knowledge and can simulate forest dynamics over spatio-temporal scales unreachable by most empirical investigations.We describe the development that different forest modelling communities have followed to underpin the leverage that simulation models offer for advancing our understanding of forest ecosystems.Using three widely applied but contrasting approaches - species distribution models, individual-based forest models, and dynamic global vegetation models - as examples, we show how scientific and technical advances have led models to transgress their initial objectives and limitations. We provide an overview of recent model applications on current important ecological topics and pinpoint ten key questions that could, and should, be tackled with forest models in the next decade.Synthesis. This overview shows that forest models, due to their complementarity and mutual enrichment, represent an invaluable toolkit to address a wide range of fundamental and applied ecological questions, hence fostering a deeper understanding of forest dynamics in the context of global change.

Identifiers

PMID33976773
PMCPMC8093733

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.