Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33976770›Full record

ReviewEcology and evolution2021

Exploring the drivers of variation in trophic mismatches: A systematic review of long-term avian studies.

Mikhail K Zhemchuzhnikov, Tom S L Versluijs, Thomas K Lameris, Jeroen Reneerkens, Christiaan Both, Jan A van Gils

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Ecology and evolution, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Phenology-informed decline risk of estuarine fishes and their prey suggests potential for future trophic mismatches.Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Mikhail K ZhemchuzhnikovNIOZ Royal Netherlands Institute for Sea Research Den Burg The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3838-6167
Tom S L VersluijsNIOZ Royal Netherlands Institute for Sea Research Den Burg The Netherlands.
Thomas K LamerisNIOZ Royal Netherlands Institute for Sea Research Den Burg The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7023-3406
Jeroen ReneerkensNIOZ Royal Netherlands Institute for Sea Research Den Burg The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0674-8143
Christiaan BothUniversity of Groningen Groningen The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7099-9831
Jan A van GilsNIOZ Royal Netherlands Institute for Sea Research Den Burg The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4132-8243

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many organisms reproduce in seasonal environments, where selection on timing of reproduction is particularly strong as consumers need to synchronize reproduction with the peaked occurrence of their food. When a consumer species changes its phenology at a slower rate than its resources, this may induce a trophic mismatch, that is, offspring growing up after the peak in food availability, potentially leading to reductions in growth and survival. However, there is large variation in the degree of trophic mismatches as well as in its effects on reproductive output.Here, we explore the potential causes for variation in the strength of trophic mismatches in published studies of birds. Specifically, we ask whether the changes in the degree of mismatch that have occurred over time can be explained by a bird's (a) breeding latitude, (b) migration distance, and/or (c) life-history traits.We found that none of these three factors explain changes in the degree of mismatch over time. Nevertheless, food phenology did advance faster at more northerly latitudes, while shifts in bird phenology did not show a trend with latitude.We argue that the lack of support in our results is attributable to the large variation in the metrics used to describe timing of food availability. We propose a pathway to improve the quantification of trophic mismatches, guided by a more rigorous understanding of links between consumers and their resources.

Indexed as

asynchronybird phenologyconsumer‐resource interactionsreproductive successtrophic mismatch

Identifiers

PMID33976770
PMCPMC8093693

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.