Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33976612›Full record

SynthesisTransfusion medicine and hemotherapy : offizielles Organ der Deutschen Gesellschaft fur Transfusionsmedizin und Immunhamatologie2021

A Systematic Review of Interventions Used to Increase Blood Donor Compliance with Deferral Criteria.

Julia C Cutts, Brendan Quinn, Clive R Seed, George Kotsiou, Ruth Pearson, Nick Scott, David P Wilson, Mary Ellen Harrod, Lisa Maher, Sharon Caris and 4 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Transfusion medicine and hemotherapy : offizielles Organ der Deutschen Gesellschaft fur Transfusionsmedizin und Immunhamatologie, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Perceptions of donor screening-Do I always need to tell the truth?Transfusion medicine (Oxford, England) · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Completing the Donor History Questionnaire before the Donation Visit Can Improve Blood Safety.Transfusion medicine and hemotherapy : offizielles Organ der Deutschen Gesellschaft fur Transfusionsmedizin und Immunhamatologie · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Julia C CuttsBurnet Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Brendan QuinnBurnet Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Clive R SeedAustralian Red Cross Lifeblood, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
George KotsiouAustralian Red Cross Lifeblood, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Ruth PearsonBurnet Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Nick ScottBurnet Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
David P WilsonBurnet Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Mary Ellen HarrodNSW Users and AIDS Association, Surry Hills, New South Wales, Australia.
Lisa MaherBurnet Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Sharon CarisHaemophilia Foundation Australia, Malvern East, Victoria, Australia.
Alex J ThompsonDepartment of Gastroenterology, St Vincent's Hospital and the University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Michael FarrellNational Drug and Alcohol Research Centre, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Joanne PinkAustralian Red Cross Lifeblood, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Margaret E HellardBurnet Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Burnet Institute · AUAustralian Red Cross Lifeblood · AUHaemophilia Foundation Australia · AUNational Association of People with HIV Australia · AUThe University of Melbourne · AUUNSW Sydney · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectivesPre-donation screening of potential blood donors is critical for ensuring the safety of the donor blood supply, and donor deferral as a result of risk factors is practised worldwide. This systematic review was conducted in the context of an expert review convened by the Australian Red Cross Lifeblood in 2013 to consider Lifeblood's injecting drug use (IDU)-related policies and aimed to identify studies assessing interventions to improve compliance with deferral criteria in blood donation settings. MATERIALS AND

methodsMEDLINE/PubMed, OVID Medline, OVID Embase, LILACS, and the Cochrane Library (CENTRAL and DARE) databases were searched for studies conducted within blood donation settings that examined interventions to increase blood donor compliance with deferral criteria. Observational and experimental studies from all geographical areas were considered.

resultsTen studies were identified that tested at least one intervention to improve blood donor compliance with deferral criteria, including computerized interviews or questionnaires, direct and indirect oral questioning, educational materials, and a combination of a tickbox questionnaire and a personal donor interview. High-quality evidence from a single study was provided for the effectiveness of a computerized interview in improving detection of HIV risk behaviour. Low-quality evidence for the effectiveness of computerized interviews was provided by 3 additional studies. Two studies reported a moderate effect of direct questioning in increasing donor deferral, but the quality of the evidence was low.

conclusionThis review identified several interventions to improve donor compliance that have been tested in blood donation settings and provided evidence for the effectiveness of computerized interviews in improving detection of risk factors.

Indexed as

Blood donorsComplianceDeferralScreening

Identifiers

PMID33976612
PMCPMC8077473
OpenAlexW3044654349

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.