ArticleInternational journal of integrated care2021
General Practitioners and Community Pharmacists' Collaboration in Primary Care: Small Steps for a Major Change.
Article in International journal of integrated care, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Physicians' Perspectives on Collaboration with Community Pharmacists: Implications for Collaborative Care in Jordan.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Good Practices and Challenges in the Collaboration of Pharmacists with General Practitioners-A Scoping Review.Pharmacy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Inter-professional collaboration in family doctor teams of the Chinese primary care system: a thematic analysis.BMC primary care · 2025Article
- Understanding collaborative working between GPs and community pharmacists: systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative studies.BJGP open · 2025Article
- The role of the community pharmacist in antibiotic use - a commentary on current status and future perspectives.Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy · 2025Article
- Implementation of medication review type 2a in community pharmacies: a longitudinal survey study.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Article
- Article
- Interpretative phenomenological analysis of the collaboration among healthcare professionals in the nursing home setting.Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy · 2024Article
- General practitioners-community pharmacists pharmacotherapy discussion groups: Analysis of their implementation through a series of case studies.Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy · 2023Article
- Defining and enhancing collaboration between community pharmacists and primary care providers to improve medication safety.Expert opinion on drug safety · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHealthcare authorities worldwide search for ways to develop integrated care and interprofessional collaboration. In Belgium, Medical-Pharmaceutical Concertation (MPC) was introduced as a format to promote constructive dialogues between GPs and community pharmacists (CPs) with a focus on pharmacotherapy.
objectiveTo evaluate the implementation of MPC from the perspective of healthcare authorities and GPs/CPs.
methodsMixed-methods approach, including semi-structured interviews with stakeholders and service users, observations of MPC meetings and surveys in GPs/CPs. Quantitative data were analyzed using descriptive statistics. Qualitative data were analyzed inductively.
resultsThe implementation of MPC took a slow start. Parties involved had divergent views on the goals of the MPC: stakeholders focused on measurable results, while service users aimed on improving interprofessional communication. Additionally, service users felt that the lack of local structures hindered consensus building and implementation of agreements in daily practice. Support from professional associations was considered indispensable for the implementation of MPC. In order to organize this efficiently, the establishment of an independent institution, coordinating the MPC initiative, was highly recommended.
conclusionThe study confirms that a thorough context assessment prior to implementation of a complex project is needed and that a step-wise approach should be respected to achieve effective interprofessional relationships.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.