Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33976596›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of integrated care2021

Barriers and Facilitators in the Uptake of Integrated Care Pathways for Older Patients by Healthcare Professionals: A Qualitative Analysis of the French National "Health Pathway of Seniors for Preserved Autonomy" Pilot Program: Barriers and Facilitators for Adhesion of Healthcare Professionals in Integrated Care for Older Patients: A Qualitative Assessment Based on the French National Experiment: 'Health Pathway of Seniors for Preserved Autonomy' (PAERPA).

Lorette Averlant, Mathieu Calafiore, François Puisieux, Claire Ramez, Fanny Sarrazin, Maxime Lotin, Romain Naessens, Apolline Delesalle, Gracia Adotey, Pascal Harduin and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of integrated care, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Lorette AverlantUniv. Lille, CHU Lille, METRICS - ULR 2694: Evaluation des technologies de santé et des pratiques médicales, F-59000 Lille, France.
Mathieu CalafioreUniv. Lille, CHU Lille, METRICS - ULR 2694: Evaluation des technologies de santé et des pratiques médicales, F-59000 Lille, France.
François PuisieuxUniv. Lille, CHU Lille, METRICS - ULR 2694: Evaluation des technologies de santé et des pratiques médicales, F-59000 Lille, France.
Claire RamezUniv. Lille, CHU Lille, METRICS - ULR 2694: Evaluation des technologies de santé et des pratiques médicales, F-59000 Lille, France.
Fanny SarrazinUniv. Lille, CHU Lille, METRICS - ULR 2694: Evaluation des technologies de santé et des pratiques médicales, F-59000 Lille, France.
Maxime LotinUniv. Lille, CHU Lille, METRICS - ULR 2694: Evaluation des technologies de santé et des pratiques médicales, F-59000 Lille, France.
Romain NaessensUniv. Lille, CHU Lille, METRICS - ULR 2694: Evaluation des technologies de santé et des pratiques médicales, F-59000 Lille, France.
Apolline DelesalleUniv. Lille, CHU Lille, METRICS - ULR 2694: Evaluation des technologies de santé et des pratiques médicales, F-59000 Lille, France.
Gracia AdoteyUniv. Lille, CHU Lille, METRICS - ULR 2694: Evaluation des technologies de santé et des pratiques médicales, F-59000 Lille, France.
Pascal HarduinUniv. Lille, CHU Lille, METRICS - ULR 2694: Evaluation des technologies de santé et des pratiques médicales, F-59000 Lille, France.
Nathalie LevequeService médecine polyvalente, Centre Hospitalier de Saint-Amand-les-Eaux, France.
Delphine DambreService médecine polyvalente, Centre Hospitalier de Saint-Amand-les-Eaux, France.
Marguerite-Marie DefebvreAgence Régionale de Santé (ARS) Hauts-de-France, Lille, France.
Carla Di MartinoUniv. Lille, CHU Lille, METRICS - ULR 2694: Evaluation des technologies de santé et des pratiques médicales, F-59000 Lille, France.
Jean-Baptiste BeuscartUniv. Lille, CHU Lille, METRICS - ULR 2694: Evaluation des technologies de santé et des pratiques médicales, F-59000 Lille, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0734-8371

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionIntegrated care is a particularly promising approach in geriatrics - a field in which the medical, psychological and social issues are often complex. The uptake of integrated care by healthcare professionals (HCPs) is essential but varies markedly. The objective of the present study of healthcare professionals was to identify barriers to and facilitators of commitment to integrated care for seniors.

methodsWe performed a two-step, qualitative study, comprising (i) six qualitative, semi-directive series of interviews with HCPs (hospital practitioners, family physicians, nurses and pharmacists) who agreed or disagreed to take part in the French national "Health Pathway of Seniors for Preserved Autonomy" (PAERPA) pilot program; and (ii) an analysis of the pooled results, in order to identify common concerns among the healthcare professionals.

resultsWe identified four key "barrier" and "facilitator" topics shared by HCPs who had committed to the pilot program and those who had not: (i) awareness of and/or interest in geriatric medicine and team working, (ii) the presence of a care coordinator; (iii) the provision of information about the program and about the patient, and communication between HCPs, and (iv) personal benefits for the HCPs and the patients. KEY

conclusionsThe four key topics identified in this large qualitative study of several healthcare professions should be considered during the design and dissemination of integrated care pathways for older patients.

Indexed as

care pathwayelderlyfrailtyintegrated care

Identifiers

PMID33976596
PMCPMC8064286

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.