ArticleInternational journal of clinical pediatric dentistry
Comparison of Shear Bond Strength of Three Commercially Available Esthetic Restorative Composite Materials: An
Article in International journal of clinical pediatric dentistry. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evaluation of SMART technique using Nano-silver fluoride and Silver Diamine Fluoride; evaluation of tooth discoloration and shear bond strength in primary molars.The Saudi dental journal · 2026Article
- Effect of adhesive strategy on the shear bond strength of monochromatic and nanohybrid composite resins to glass ionomer cements in the sandwich technique.Frontiers in dental medicine · 2026Article
- Comparative Evaluation of Shear Bond Strength of Fifth, Seventh, and Eighth-generation Bonding Agents in Permanent Teeth: AnInternational journal of clinical pediatric dentistry · 2025Article
- Effect of time and photoactivated face on bond strength of brackets and on degree of monomer conversion.Clinical oral investigations · 2024Article
- Comparative Evaluation of Shear Bond Strength of Bonded Space Maintainers Using Ormocers, Nanofilled and Glass Fiber-reinforced Adhesive Composites.International journal of clinical pediatric dentistry · 2024Article
- Minimally Invasive Esthetic Reinforcement of a Fractured Anterior Tooth Using Dentapreg PINPost: A Case Report.Cureus · 2024Article
- Effect of in-office bleaching agent on the surface roughness and microhardness of nanofilled and nanohybrid composite resins.F1000Research · 2023Article
- Shear Bond Strength and Color Stability of Novel Antibacterial Nanofilled Dental Adhesive Resins.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Article
- Evaluation of Shear Bond Strength between Resin Composites and Conventional Glass Ionomer Cement in Class II Restorative Technique-An In Vitro Study.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Evaluation of Shear Bond Strength of Resin-Based Composites to Biodentine with Three Types of Seventh-Generation Bonding Agents: AnInternational journal of dentistry · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionDental caries remains to be one of the most prevalent diseases encountered in the field of dentistry. Several restorative materials have been introduced with variable properties and among them, composite restorative materials are most widely used nowadays because of their superior esthetic property as well as minimal hard tissue removal. Shear bond strength of a restorative material plays a key role in deciding the restoration's longevity. Hence, for a better selection of the composite material, shear bond strength needs to be evaluated.
aimThe study aim was to analyze the shear bond strength of three commercially available esthetic restorative composite materials-Dentsply Ceram X, 3M ESPE™ Filtek™ Z350 XT, and GC Solare Sculpt to the tooth surface. MATERIALS AND
methodsThirty extracted human mandibular permanent molars that were caries-free were selected and erected in acrylic blocks. The uniform dentinal surface was exposed by cutting with a diamond disk. These were then randomly divided into three groups-groups I, II, and III based on the restorative material which was used, i.e., Ceram X, 3M ESPE™ Filtek™ Z350 XT, and Solare Sculpt, respectively. The restorative materials were applied on the dentinal surface of the prepared tooth specimens with the help of plastic molds, followed up by storing them in distilled water until they were subjected to shear bond strength testing. The collected data were examined by applying a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Turkey's
resultsThe Ceram X (21.6155 ± 2.20717) and Solare Sculpt (19.8747 ± 3.99732) were comparable in terms of shear bond strength values; however, they depicted significantly higher bond strength compared to 3M ESPE™ Filtek™ Z350 XT (12.8068 ± 3.99732).
conclusionAmong the three materials compared in this study, Ceram X produced higher shear bond strength to tooth surface when compared to Solare Sculpt and 3M ESPE™ Filtek™ Z350 XT. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Restoration failure continues to be a major problem taking a toll on the dentists' time and patient satisfaction. Thus, the demand for restorative materials with better shear bond strength as well as excellent esthetics is on the rise. Thus, this particular study compares the shear bond strength of three commercial esthetic nanocomposites. HOW TO CITE THIS ARTICLE: Preethy NA, Jeevanandan G, Govindaraju L,
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.