Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33976352›Full record

Trial reportScientific reports2021

Carbon nanoparticle suspension could help get a more accurate nodal staging for patient with rectal cancer.

Wei Ge, Qiang Li, Wen-Jia Liu, Xiao-Qi Zhang, Xiang-Shan Fan, Li-Hua Shao, Liang Tao, Wen-Xian Guan, Gang Chen

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Efficacy of Nano-Carbon Tracing Versus Indocyanine Green in Lymph Node Detection for Minimally Invasive Colorectal Resection.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Wei Ge *Gastrointestinal Center, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, The Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School, Nanjing, 210008, Jiangsu, People's Republic of China.
Qiang Li *Gastrointestinal Center, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, The Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School, Nanjing, 210008, Jiangsu, People's Republic of China.
Wen-Jia LiuDepartment of Gastroenterology, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, The Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School, Nanjing, 210008, Jiangsu, People's Republic of China.
Xiao-Qi ZhangDepartment of Gastroenterology, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, The Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School, Nanjing, 210008, Jiangsu, People's Republic of China.
Xiang-Shan FanDepartment of Pathology, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, The Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School, Nanjing, 210008, Jiangsu, People's Republic of China.
Li-Hua ShaoGastrointestinal Center, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, The Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School, Nanjing, 210008, Jiangsu, People's Republic of China.
Liang TaoGastrointestinal Center, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, The Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School, Nanjing, 210008, Jiangsu, People's Republic of China.
Wen-Xian GuanGastrointestinal Center, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, The Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School, Nanjing, 210008, Jiangsu, People's Republic of China. medguanwx@163.com.
Gang ChenGastrointestinal Center, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, The Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School, Nanjing, 210008, Jiangsu, People's Republic of China. 331812195@qq.com.
Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate whether carbon nanoparticles could improve the accuracy of nodal staging in colorectal cancer (CRC). We performed a randomized controlled trial with CRC at the department of general surgery, the affiliated hospital of Nanjing University Medical School. A total of 160 patients were recruited in this research and 132 patients were included in the safety analyses. Among these patients, 72 cases were classified into control group and 60 cases into study group. The mean number of lymph nodes harvested from patients in study group was 19.3 ± 6.7 (range from 4 to 38), which was higher than that in control group (15.1 ± 5.7 (range from 3 to 29)) (p < 0.001). The mean number of positive lymph nodes got from patients in study group was 1.7 ± 3.5 (range from 0 to 22), which was also higher than that in control group (0.7 ± 1.4 (range from 0 to 7)) (p = 0.045). In study group, there were 30 patients (50%) proved to be N0, and remaining 30 patients (50%) were N1 or N2. However, 50 patients (69.4%) were N0 and 22 patients (30.6%) were N1 or N2 in control group. The rate of N0 in control group was significantly higher than that in study group (p = 0.023). Injecting carbon nanoparticle suspension could get a more accurate nodal staging to receive enough chemoradiotherapy, improving prognosis. Besides, injecting carbon nanoparticles suspension at four points 5 cm, 10 cm, 15 cm and 20 cm away from the anus by "sandwich" method was a new try.Trial registration: This study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number ChiCTR1900025127 on 12/8/2019.

Indexed as

AdultAgedCarbonChinaFemaleHumansLymphatic MetastasisLymph Node ExcisionLymph NodesMaleMiddle AgedNanoparticlesNeoplasm StagingPrognosisRectal NeoplasmsSuspensionsCarbonSuspensions

Identifiers

PMID33976352
PMCPMC8113261
OpenAlexW3162220751

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.