ArticleScientific reports2021
Two-step machine learning method for the rapid analysis of microvascular flow in intravital video microscopy.
Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Linking preclinical models with functional imaging and artificial intelligence to decode tumor angiogenesis.Pharmacological reports : PR · 2026Review
- Dialyzer characteristics are associated with differential effects on intradialytic microvascular tissue perfusion.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2026Article
- The Effect of Dialysate Sodium on Endothelial Injury and Microcirculatory Dysfunction.Kidney360 · 2025Article
- Artificial intelligence strategies based on random forests for detecting ischemia-reperfusion injury changes in kidney tissue during intravital imaging.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Article
- Automated Stabilization, Enhancement and Capillaries Segmentation in Videocapillaroscopy.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Intravital microscopic observation of the microvasculature during hemodialysis in healthy rats.Scientific reports · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Microvascular blood flow is crucial for tissue and organ function and is often severely affected by diseases. Therefore, investigating the microvasculature under different pathological circumstances is essential to understand the role of the microcirculation in health and sickness. Microvascular blood flow is generally investigated with Intravital Video Microscopy (IVM), and the captured images are stored on a computer for later off-line analysis. The analysis of these images is a manual and challenging process, evaluating experiments very time consuming and susceptible to human error. Since more advanced digital cameras are used in IVM, the experimental data volume will also increase significantly. This study presents a new two-step image processing algorithm that uses a trained Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) to functionally analyze IVM microscopic images without the need for manual analysis. While the first step uses a modified vessel segmentation algorithm to extract the location of vessel-like structures, the second step uses a 3D-CNN to assess whether the vessel-like structures have blood flowing in it or not. We demonstrate that our two-step algorithm can efficiently analyze IVM image data with high accuracy (83%). To our knowledge, this is the first application of machine learning for the functional analysis of microvascular blood flow in vivo.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.