Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33976284›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2021

Molecular detection of giant snakeheads, Channa micropeltes (Cuvier, 1831), one of the most troublesome fish species.

Maslin Osathanunkul, Toshifumi Minamoto

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. An eDNA-based assessment ofEcology and evolution · 2024
    Article
  3. Detection of the Endangered Siamese Bat Catfish (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Maslin OsathanunkulDepartment of Biology, Faculty of Science, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, 50200, Thailand. maslin.cmu@gmail.com.
Toshifumi MinamotoGraduate School of Human Development and Environment, Kobe University, Hyogo, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A lack of reliable tools for determining the presence and distribution of fish species can impede understanding of predator-prey interactions and fishery management. Conventional fish survey methods are invasive, and can be size or species selective. Combining netting and electrofishing is a current method used to monitor fish species in Phayao Lake (Kwan Phayao), Thailand. However, the methods are inefficient and time-consuming. Recently, locals who rely on inland fisheries in Kwan Phayao expressed their deep concerns about the giant snakehead, Channa micropeltes (Cuvier, 1831) destroying other fish there. The giant snakehead prey on many commercially important fish species, as the prey species is reduced, negative effects on both biodiversity and the fishery sector could follow. Here, an eDNA-based survey was developed to detect the presence of the giant snakehead. Water samples were collected from six sites within Kwan Phayao and 17 sites in Ing River where water flowed into and out of Kwan Payao. The eDNA of the giant snakehead was detected in water samples from all collection sites using the developed qPCR assay with various concentrations. The eDNA was shown here to be a sensitive and reliable tool for fish surveillance so there will be a better chance for developing an effective management strategy.

Indexed as

AnimalsBiodiversityDNA Barcoding, TaxonomicDNA, EnvironmentalEnvironmental MonitoringFisheriesFishesIntroduced SpeciesLakesRiversThailandDNA, Environmental

Identifiers

PMID33976284
PMCPMC8113229

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.