Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33976268›Full record

Observational studyScientific reports2021

Combining radiomic phenotypes of non-small cell lung cancer with liquid biopsy data may improve prediction of response to EGFR inhibitors.

Bardia Yousefi, Michael J LaRiviere, Eric A Cohen, Thomas H Buckingham, Stephanie S Yee, Taylor A Black, Austin L Chien, Peter Noël, Wei-Ting Hwang, Sharyn I Katz and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Predictive value ofAnnals of nuclear medicine · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Tumor classification of gastrointestinal liver metastases using CT-based radiomics and deep learning.Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Bardia YousefiDepartment of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.
Michael J LaRiviereDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.
Eric A CohenDepartment of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.
Thomas H BuckinghamDivision of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.
Stephanie S YeeDivision of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.
Taylor A BlackDivision of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.
Austin L ChienDivision of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.
Peter NoëlDepartment of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.
Wei-Ting HwangDepartment of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.
Sharyn I KatzDepartment of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.
Charu AggarwalDivision of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.
Jeffrey C ThompsonSection of Interventional Pulmonology, Department of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.
Erica L Carpenter *Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.
Despina Kontos *Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA. Despina.Kontos@pennmedicine.upenn.edu.
University of Pennsylvania · US

Funding

Translational Research Support CoreP30ES013508 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI Trevor M Penning · 2006 to 2026
$35.3M
Biomedical Image Computing and Informatics ClusterS10OD023495 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI DAVATZIKOS, CHRISTOS · 2017 to 2017
$1.9M
Myopenia and Mechanisms of Chemotherapy Toxicity in Older Adults with Colorectal Cancer: The M&M StudyK08CA234225 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI WILLIAMS, GRANT R · 2018 to 2022
$1.0M
A multimodal approach to develop molecular markers to predict response to immune targeted agents in non-small cell lung cancerK08CA234335 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI THOMPSON, JEFFREY C · 2018 to 2022
$982k
National Cancer Institute at the National Institutes of Health CA234225-02NCI NIH HHS K08 CA234335NIEHS NIH HHS P30 ES013508NIH HHS S10 OD023495
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Among non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with therapeutically targetable tumor mutations in epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), not all patients respond to targeted therapy. Combining circulating-tumor DNA (ctDNA), clinical variables, and radiomic phenotypes may improve prediction of EGFR-targeted therapy outcomes for NSCLC. This single-center retrospective study included 40 EGFR-mutant advanced NSCLC patients treated with EGFR-targeted therapy. ctDNA data included number of mutations and detection of EGFR T790M. Clinical data included age, smoking status, and ECOG performance status. Baseline chest CT scans were analyzed to extract 429 radiomic features from each primary tumor. Unsupervised hierarchical clustering was used to group tumors into phenotypes. Kaplan-Meier (K-M) curves and Cox proportional hazards regression were modeled for progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Likelihood ratio test (LRT) was used to compare fit between models. Among 40 patients (73% women, median age 62 years), consensus clustering identified two radiomic phenotypes. For PFS, the model combining radiomic phenotypes with ctDNA and clinical variables had c-statistic of 0.77 and a better fit (LRT p = 0.01) than the model with clinical and ctDNA variables alone with a c-statistic of 0.73. For OS, adding radiomic phenotypes resulted in c-statistic of 0.83 versus 0.80 when using clinical and ctDNA variables (LRT p = 0.08). Both models showed separation of K-M curves dichotomized by median prognostic score (p < 0.005). Combining radiomic phenotypes, ctDNA, and clinical variables may enhance precision oncology approaches to managing advanced non-small cell lung cancer with EGFR mutations.

Indexed as

Genes, erbB-1Image Processing, Computer-AssistedTomography, X-Ray ComputedAgedAged, 80 and overAntineoplastic AgentsCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungCirculating Tumor DNAErbB ReceptorsFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansLiquid BiopsyLung NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedAntineoplastic AgentsCirculating Tumor DNAEGFR protein, humanErbB Receptors

Identifiers

PMID33976268
PMCPMC8113313
OpenAlexW3161672899

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.