Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33976264›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2021

Radiomics-based neural network predicts recurrence patterns in glioblastoma using dynamic susceptibility contrast-enhanced MRI.

Ka Young Shim, Sung Won Chung, Jae Hak Jeong, Inpyeong Hwang, Chul-Kee Park, Tae Min Kim, Sung-Hye Park, Jae Kyung Won, Joo Ho Lee, Soon-Tae Lee and 7 more

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Radiomics-based differentiation between glioblastoma and primary central nervous system lymphoma: CT vs MRI.Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2026
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Ka Young Shim *Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Sung Won Chung *Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Jae Hak Jeong *Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Inpyeong HwangDepartment of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, 101 Daehangno, Jongno-gu, Seoul, 110-744, Republic of Korea.
Chul-Kee ParkDepartment of Neurosurgery and Biomedical Research Institute, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
Tae Min KimDepartment of Internal Medicine and Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
Sung-Hye ParkDepartment of Pathology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
Jae Kyung WonDepartment of Pathology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
Joo Ho LeeDepartment of Radiation Oncology and Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
Soon-Tae LeeDepartment of Neurology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
Roh-Eul YooDepartment of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, 101 Daehangno, Jongno-gu, Seoul, 110-744, Republic of Korea.
Koung Mi KangDepartment of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, 101 Daehangno, Jongno-gu, Seoul, 110-744, Republic of Korea.
Tae Jin YunDepartment of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, 101 Daehangno, Jongno-gu, Seoul, 110-744, Republic of Korea.
Ji-Hoon KimDepartment of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, 101 Daehangno, Jongno-gu, Seoul, 110-744, Republic of Korea.
Chul-Ho SohnDepartment of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, 101 Daehangno, Jongno-gu, Seoul, 110-744, Republic of Korea.
Kyu Sung ChoiDepartment of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, 101 Daehangno, Jongno-gu, Seoul, 110-744, Republic of Korea. kyuchoi86@gmail.com.
Seung Hong ChoiSeoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea. verocay@snuh.org.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Glioblastoma remains the most devastating brain tumor despite optimal treatment, because of the high rate of recurrence. Distant recurrence has distinct genomic alterations compared to local recurrence, which requires different treatment planning both in clinical practice and trials. To date, perfusion-weighted MRI has revealed that perfusional characteristics of tumor are associated with prognosis. However, not much research has focused on recurrence patterns in glioblastoma: namely, local and distant recurrence. Here, we propose two different neural network models to predict the recurrence patterns in glioblastoma that utilizes high-dimensional radiomic profiles based on perfusion MRI: area under the curve (AUC) (95% confidence interval), 0.969 (0.903-1.000) for local recurrence; 0.864 (0.726-0.976) for distant recurrence for each patient in the validation set. This creates an opportunity to provide personalized medicine in contrast to studies investigating only group differences. Moreover, interpretable deep learning identified that salient radiomic features for each recurrence pattern are related to perfusional intratumoral heterogeneity. We also demonstrated that the combined salient radiomic features, or "radiomic risk score", increased risk of recurrence/progression (hazard ratio, 1.61; p = 0.03) in multivariate Cox regression on progression-free survival.

Indexed as

Magnetic Resonance ImagingNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalNeural Networks, ComputerAgedBrain NeoplasmsCerebral Blood VolumeFemaleGlioblastomaHumansMaleMiddle AgedPerfusion ImagingRisk Assessment

Identifiers

PMID33976264
PMCPMC8113258

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.