ArticleScientific reports2021
IDH2 mutations in patients with normal karyotype AML predict favorable responses to daunorubicin, cytarabine and cladribine regimen.
Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Resistance to Targeted Therapy in AML: Current Challenges and Emerging Treatment Strategies.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Identification and validation of lymphangiogenesis-related genes for predicting acute myeloid leukemia prognosis: insights from bulk RNA sequencing and single-cell RNA sequencing analyses.Clinical and experimental medicine · 2026Article
- Precision oncology to overcome resistance in R/R AML in children and adults requires combinations of cytotoxic, targeted, and immunological treatments.Journal of internal medicine · 2025Review
- Feasible and Rapid Screening ofDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Anti-proliferative effects of a polyherbal formulation on HL-60, HCT-116, and HeLa cell lines: a docking simulation and response surface design-aided study.Frontiers in chemistry · 2025Article
- Clinical Implications of Isocitrate Dehydrogenase Mutations and Targeted Treatment of Acute Myeloid Leukemia with Mutant Isocitrate Dehydrogenase Inhibitors-Recent Advances, Challenges and Future Prospects.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- Clinical prognostic value of different NPM1 mutations in acute myeloid leukemia patients.Annals of hematology · 2024Article
- A hybrid protocol CLAG-M, a possible player for the first-line therapy of patients with mixed phenotype acute leukemia. A Polish Adult Leukemia Group experience.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Article
- Advances in the pharmacological management of acute myeloid leukemia in adults.Expert opinion on pharmacotherapy · 2022Article
- Unified classification and risk-stratification in Acute Myeloid Leukemia.Nature communications · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
52 authors at 15 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Mutations in isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 and 2 (IDH1/2) genes occur in about 20% patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML), leading to DNA hypermethylation and epigenetic deregulation. We assessed the prognostic significance of IDH1/2 mutations (IDH1/2
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.