Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33976167›Full record

ArticleNature communications2021

Snapshots into carbon dots formation through a combined spectroscopic approach.

Francesco Rigodanza, Max Burian, Francesca Arcudi, Luka Đorđević, Heinz Amenitsch, Maurizio Prato

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
50citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

50 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Francesco Rigodanza *Department of Chemical and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Trieste, 34127, Trieste, Italy.
Max Burian *Institute of Inorganic Chemistry, Graz University of Technology, Graz, 8010, Austria.ORCID 0000-0001-6728-6347
Francesca ArcudiDepartment of Chemical and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Trieste, 34127, Trieste, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-1909-5241
Luka ĐorđevićDepartment of Chemical and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Trieste, 34127, Trieste, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-8346-7110
Heinz AmenitschInstitute of Inorganic Chemistry, Graz University of Technology, Graz, 8010, Austria. amenitsch@tugraz.at.ORCID 0000-0002-0788-1336
Maurizio PratoDepartment of Chemical and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Trieste, 34127, Trieste, Italy. prato@units.it.ORCID 0000-0002-8869-8612

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The design of novel carbon dots with ad hoc properties requires a comprehensive understanding of their formation mechanism, which is a complex task considering the number of variables involved, such as reaction time, structure of precursors or synthetic protocol employed. Herein, we systematically investigated the formation of carbon nanodots by tracking structural, chemical and photophysical features during the hydrothermal synthesis. We demonstrate that the formation of carbon nanodots consists of 4 consecutive steps: (i) aggregation of small organic molecules, (ii) formation of a dense core with an extended shell, (iii) collapse of the shell and (iv) aromatization of the core. In addition, we provide examples of routes towards tuning the core-shell design, synthesizing five novel carbon dots that all consist of an electron-dense core covered by an amine rich ligand shell.

Identifiers

PMID33976167
PMCPMC8113590

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.