Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33976104›Full record

ArticleThe American journal of case reports2021

Implantation of the Vibrant Soundbridge in a Case of Bilateral Malformation of the Middle and External Ear.

Henryk Skarżyński, Łukasz Plichta, Bartłomiej Król, Katarzyna Beata Cywka, Piotr Henryk Skarżyński

Open access · hybridAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in The American journal of case reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. New technology can benefit established middle ear implant users: Samba 2 vs previous models of audio processors for Vibrant Soundbridge.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2023
    Article
  3. Evaluation of the Bonebridge BCI 602 active bone conductive implant in adults: efficacy and stability of audiological, surgical, and functional outcomes.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2022
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Henryk SkarżyńskiOto-Rhino-Laryngosurgery Clinic, Institute of Physiology and Pathology of Hearing, Kajetany/Warsaw, Poland.
Łukasz PlichtaOto-Rhino-Laryngosurgery Clinic, Institute of Physiology and Pathology of Hearing, Kajetany/Warsaw, Poland.
Bartłomiej KrólOto-Rhino-Laryngosurgery Clinic, Institute of Physiology and Pathology of Hearing, Kajetany/Warsaw, Poland.
Katarzyna Beata CywkaOto-Rhino-Laryngosurgery Clinic, Institute of Physiology and Pathology of Hearing, Kajetany/Warsaw, Poland.
Piotr Henryk SkarżyńskiOto-Rhino-Laryngosurgery Clinic, Institute of Physiology and Pathology of Hearing, Kajetany/Warsaw, Poland.
Institute of Physiology and Pathology of Hearing · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND Here we present a case of Vibrant Soundbridge implantation in a 13-year-old girl with bilateral aural atresia of the external ear canal. In this instance, we attached the device's floating mass transducer (FMT) to a mobilizable complex of the incus and malleus, which functionally connected to the short process of the incus. CASE REPORT The article presents a case study of a patient with a congenital defect of the middle and external ear and conductive hearing loss, who was referred for middle ear implantation. Tonal audiometry revealed bilateral moderate to severe hearing loss with a 30 to 50 dB air-bone gap. After making a sufficiently wide antromastoidectomy, it became apparent that implantation of the MedEl Bonebridge hearing aid was not possible because of an overhanging dura. The short process of the incus was then visualized and, by drilling the bone laterally and anteriorly, the incus and malleus were found to have formed a conglomerate, firmly fused to the anterior wall of a rather small tympanic cavity. By removing the bony adhesion, mobility of the ossicular chain was restored. The MedEl Vibrant Soundbridge could then be implanted by attaching its FMT to the incus-like conglomerate. CONCLUSIONS Restoration of ossicular chain mobility was achieved, and the patient's hearing was improved by implanting the Vibrant Soundbridge hearing aid. Speech audiometry 1 month later showed improved hearing. Implantation of the Vibrant Soundbridge following ossiculoplasty may be a feasible solution in cases of bilateral congenital defect of the middle and external ear.

Indexed as

Hearing AidsOssicular ProsthesisAdolescentEar, ExternalFemaleHearing Loss, ConductiveHumansIncus

Identifiers

PMID33976104
PMCPMC8126584
OpenAlexW3155485814

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.