Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33976078›Full record

ArticleMedical care2021

Rural Veterans' Experiences With Outpatient Care in the Veterans Health Administration Versus Community Care.

Heather Davila, Amy K Rosen, Erin Beilstein-Wedel, Michael Shwartz, Leslie Chatelain, Deborah Gurewich

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical care, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Observational
  3. "Hit or Miss": Rural Veterans' Experiences Receiving Community Mental Health Care.The Journal of rural health : official journal of the American Rural Health Association and the National Rural Health Care Association · 2026
    Article
  4. Post-Intensive Care Fragmentation Among Rural Veterans: Transitions Between VA and Community Health Systems.The Journal of rural health : official journal of the American Rural Health Association and the National Rural Health Care Association · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Utilization and Cost of Veterans Health Administration Referrals to Community Care-Based Physical Therapy.Federal practitioner : for the health care professionals of the VA, DoD, and PHS · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Heather DavilaVA Boston Healthcare System.
Amy K RosenVA Boston Healthcare System.
Erin Beilstein-WedelVA Boston Healthcare System.
Michael ShwartzVA Boston Healthcare System.
Leslie ChatelainVA Boston Healthcare System.
Deborah GurewichVA Boston Healthcare System.

Funding

HSR&D Senior Research Career Scientist AwardIK6HX002839 · VA · VA BOSTON HEALTH CARE SYSTEM · PI AMY K ROSEN · 2020 to 2026
–
HSRD VA IK6 HX002839
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe 2014 Veterans Access, Choice and Accountability Act was intended to improve Veterans' access to timely health care by expanding their options to receive community care (CC) paid for by the Veterans Health Administration (VA). Although CC could particularly benefit rural Veterans, we know little about rural Veterans' experiences with CC.

objectiveThe objective of this study was to compare rural Veterans' experiences with CC and VA outpatient health care services to those of urban Veterans and examine changes over time. RESEARCH

designRetrospective, cross-sectional study using data from the Survey of Healthcare Experiences of Patients (SHEP) and VA Corporate Data Warehouse. Subjects: All Veterans who responded to the SHEP survey in Fiscal Year (FY) 16 or FY19. MEASURES: Outcomes were 4 measures of care experience (Access, Communication, Coordination, and Provider Rating). Independent variables included care setting (CC/VA), rural/urban status, and demographic and clinical characteristics.

resultsCompared with urban Veterans, rural Veterans rated CC the same (for specialty care) or better (for primary care). Rural Veterans reported worse experiences in CC versus VA, except for specialty care Access. Rural Veterans' care experiences improved between FY16 and FY19 in both CC and VA, with greater improvements in CC.

conclusionsRural Veterans' reported comparable or better experiences in CC compared with urban Veterans, but rural Veterans' CC experiences still lagged behind their experiences in VA for primary care. As growing numbers of Veterans use CC, VA should ensure that rural and urban Veterans' experiences with CC are at least comparable to their experiences with VA care.

Indexed as

AgedAmbulatory CareCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHealth Care SurveysHealth Services AccessibilityHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient Acceptance of Health CarePatient Freedom of Choice LawsRetrospective StudiesRural PopulationUnited StatesUnited States Department of Veterans AffairsVeterans

Identifiers

PMID33976078
PMCPMC8132914

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.