Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33975936›Full record

ArticlemBio2021

Manure Microbial Communities and Resistance Profiles Reconfigure after Transition to Manure Pits and Differ from Those in Fertilized Field Soil.

Kimberley V Sukhum, Rhiannon C Vargas, Manish Boolchandani, Alaric W D'Souza, Sanket Patel, Akhil Kesaraju, Gretchen Walljasper, Harshad Hegde, Zhan Ye, Robert K Valenzuela and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in mBio, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Kimberley V Sukhum *The Edison Family Center for Genome Sciences and Systems Biology, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4428-5381
Rhiannon C Vargas *The Edison Family Center for Genome Sciences and Systems Biology, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0434-6178
Manish BoolchandaniThe Edison Family Center for Genome Sciences and Systems Biology, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
Alaric W D'Souza *The Edison Family Center for Genome Sciences and Systems Biology, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8744-8136
Sanket PatelThe Edison Family Center for Genome Sciences and Systems Biology, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
Akhil KesarajuThe Edison Family Center for Genome Sciences and Systems Biology, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
Gretchen WalljasperThe Edison Family Center for Genome Sciences and Systems Biology, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
Harshad HegdeCenter for Oral Systemic Health, Marshfield Clinic Research Institute, Marshfield, Wisconsin, USA.
Zhan YeCenter for Precision Medicine Research, Marshfield Clinic Research Institute, Marshfield, Wisconsin, USA.
Robert K ValenzuelaCenter for Precision Medicine Research, Marshfield Clinic Research Institute, Marshfield, Wisconsin, USA.
Paul GundersonLake Region State College, Devils Lake, North Dakota, USA.
Casper BendixsenNational Farm Medicine Center, Marshfield Clinic Research Institute, Marshfield, Wisconsin, USA.
Gautam DantasThe Edison Family Center for Genome Sciences and Systems Biology, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri, USA dantas@wustl.edu shukla.sanjay@mcrf.mfldclin.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-0455-8370
Sanjay K ShuklaCenter for Precision Medicine Research, Marshfield Clinic Research Institute, Marshfield, Wisconsin, USA dantas@wustl.edu shukla.sanjay@mcrf.mfldclin.edu.

Funding

NATIONAL RESEARCH SERVICE AWARD-MEDICAL SCIENTISTT32GM007200 · NIGMS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI YOKOYAMA, WAYNE M. · 1985 to 2024
$59.8M
High Plains Intermountain Center for Agricultural Health and Safety-RenewalU54OH008085 · OH · COLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI STALLONES, LORANN · 2011 to 2025
$22.2M
INSTITUTIONAL TRAINING GRANT IN GENOMIC SCIENCET32HG000045 · NHGRI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI MICHAEL R BRENT, Barak A Cohen · 1997 to 2026
$8.4M
MAXIMIZING STUDENT DIVERSITY IN THE BIOMEDICAL SCIENCES AT WASHINGTON UNIVERSITYR25GM103757 · NIGMS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI SKEATH, JAMES BENJAMIN · 2013 to 2022
$4.5M
Occupational Exposure and Health Risk from Dairy Microbiome and Resistome to Dairy Farm WorkersR01OH011578 · OH · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI DANTAS, GAUTAM, SHUKLA, SANJAY K · 2018 to 2021
$2.0M
GENOMIC ANALYSES OF DROSOPHILA DEVELOPMENTK22HG000045 · NHGRI · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI WHITE, KEVIN P · 2000 to 2004
$1.3M
ACL HHS U54OH008085NHGRI NIH HHS K22 HG000045NHGRI NIH HHS T32 HG000045NIGMS NIH HHS R25 GM103757NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM007200NIOSH CDC HHS R01 OH011578NIOSH CDC HHS U54 OH008085
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In agricultural settings, microbes and antimicrobial resistance genes (ARGs) have the potential to be transferred across diverse environments and ecosystems. The consequences of these microbial transfers are unclear and understudied. On dairy farms, the storage of cow manure in manure pits and subsequent application to field soil as a fertilizer may facilitate the spread of the mammalian gut microbiome and its associated ARGs to the environment. To determine the extent of both taxonomic and resistance similarity during these transitions, we collected fresh manure, manure from pits, and field soil across 15 different dairy farms for three consecutive seasons. We used a combination of shotgun metagenomic sequencing and functional metagenomics to quantitatively interrogate taxonomic and ARG compositional variation on farms. We found that as the microbiome transitions from fresh dairy cow manure to manure pits, microbial taxonomic compositions and resistance profiles experience distinct restructuring, including decreases in alpha diversity and shifts in specific ARG abundances that potentially correspond to fresh manure going from a gut-structured community to an environment-structured community. Further, we did not find evidence of shared microbial community or a transfer of ARGs between manure and field soil microbiomes. Our results suggest that fresh manure experiences a compositional change in manure pits during storage and that the storage of manure in manure pits does not result in a depletion of ARGs. We did not find evidence of taxonomic or ARG restructuring of soil microbiota with the application of manure to field soils, as soil communities remained resilient to manure-induced perturbation.

Indexed as

MetagenomicsSoil MicrobiologyAgricultureAnimalsAnti-Bacterial AgentsCattleDairyingDrug Resistance, MicrobialFarmsFemaleGenes, BacterialManureMetagenomeMicrobiotaSeasonsAnti-Bacterial AgentsManureagricultureantimicrobial resistancedairy farmmanuremicrobiome

Identifiers

PMID33975936
PMCPMC8262906

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.