Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33975926›Full record

ArticleThorax2022

Lung function in children with cystic fibrosis in the USA and UK: a comparative longitudinal analysis of national registry data.

Daniela K Schlüter, Josh S Ostrenga, Siobhán B Carr, Aliza K Fink, Albert Faro, Rhonda D Szczesniak, Ruth H Keogh, Susan C Charman, Bruce C Marshall, Christopher H Goss and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Thorax, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Microbial and host innate immune factors affecting the persistence ofFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Competitive fitness ofFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Daniela K SchlüterDepartment of Public Health, Policy and Systems, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK d.k.schlueter@liverpool.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0001-9018-0022
Josh S OstrengaCystic Fibrosis Foundation, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Siobhán B CarrRoyal Brompton Hospital, London, UK.
Aliza K FinkCystic Fibrosis Foundation, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Albert FaroCystic Fibrosis Foundation, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Rhonda D SzczesniakDepartment of Pediatrics, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0705-715X
Ruth H KeoghDepartment of Medical Statistics, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Susan C CharmanUK Cystic Fibrosis Trust, London, UK.
Bruce C MarshallCystic Fibrosis Foundation, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Christopher H GossDepartments of Medicine and Pediatrics, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
David Taylor-RobinsonDepartment of Public Health, Policy and Systems, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.

Funding

Institute of Translational Health SciencesUL1TR000423 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI DISIS, MARY L. · 2012 to 2016
$49.4M
Translational Research Center to Expedite Novel Therapies in Cystic FibrosisP30DK089507 · NIDDK · SEATTLE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL · PI Christopher Hooper Goss · 2010 to 2026
$21.4M
Proof of Principle Evaluation of IV Gallium Nitrate in Patients with CFUM1HL119073 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI GOSS, CHRISTOPHER HOOPER, SINGH, PRADEEP K · 2013 to 2017
$4.8M
OPTIMIZE - DCCU01HL114589 · NHLBI · SEATTLE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL · PI HAMBLETT, NICOLE MAYER · 2013 to 2017
$3.3M
R01- Mapping environmental contributions to rapid lung disease progression in cystic fibrosisR01HL141286 · NHLBI · CINCINNATI CHILDRENS HOSP MED CTR · PI SZCZESNIAK, RHONDA · 2019 to 2023
$2.3M
Phase 2 Study of Intravenous Gallium Nitrate in the Treatment of Cystic FibrosisR01FD003704 · FDA · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI GOSS, CHRISTOPHER HOOPER · 2009 to 2018
$2.0M
FDA HHS R01 FD003704Medical Research Council G0802448Medical Research Council MR/P008577/1Medical Research Council MR/S017968/1NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000423NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL141286NHLBI NIH HHS U01 HL114589NHLBI NIH HHS UM1 HL119073NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK089507
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

rationaleA previous analysis found significantly higher lung function in the US paediatric cystic fibrosis (CF) population compared with the UK with this difference apparently decreasing in adolescence and adulthood. However, the cross-sectional nature of the study makes it hard to interpret these results.

objectivesTo compare longitudinal trajectories of lung function in children with CF between the USA and UK and to explore reasons for any differences.

methodsWe used mixed effects regression analysis to model lung function trajectories in the study populations. Using descriptive statistics, we compared early growth and nutrition (height, weight, body mass index), infections (

resultsWe included 9463 children from the USA and 3055 children from the UK with homozygous F508del genotype. Lung function was higher in the USA than in the UK when first measured at age six and remained higher throughout childhood. We did not find important differences in early growth and nutrition, or

conclusionsChildren with CF and homozygous F508del genotype in the USA had better lung function than UK children. These differences do not appear to be explained by early growth or nutrition, but differences in the use of early treatments need further investigation.

Indexed as

Cystic FibrosisPseudomonas InfectionsAdolescentAdultChildCross-Sectional StudiesHumansLungPseudomonas aeruginosaRegistriesStaphylococcus aureusUnited Kingdomclinical epidemiologycystic fibrosispaediatric lung disaese

Identifiers

PMID33975926
PMCPMC8581063

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.