Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33975887›Full record

ArticleBMJ global health2021

Health system influences on the implementation of tuberculosis infection prevention and control at health facilities in low-income and middle-income countries: a scoping review.

Gimenne Zwama, Karin Diaconu, Anna S Voce, Fiona O'May, Alison D Grant, Karina Kielmann

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ global health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Structural guidelines for the sustainability of the tuberculosis infection control planBiomedica : revista del Instituto Nacional de Salud · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Exploring the role of candidalysin in the pathogenicity ofAmerican journal of translational research · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Gimenne ZwamaInstitute for Global Health and Development, School of Health Sciences, Queen Margaret University, Edinburgh, UK gzwama@qmu.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0001-9458-522X
Karin DiaconuInstitute for Global Health and Development, School of Health Sciences, Queen Margaret University, Edinburgh, UK.
Anna S VocePublic Health Medicine, School of Nursing and Public Health, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa.
Fiona O'MayInstitute for Global Health and Development, School of Health Sciences, Queen Margaret University, Edinburgh, UK.
Alison D GrantTB Centre, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Karina KielmannInstitute for Global Health and Development, School of Health Sciences, Queen Margaret University, Edinburgh, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5519-1658

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTuberculosis infection prevention and control (TB-IPC) measures are consistently reported to be poorly implemented globally. TB-IPC guidelines provide limited recognition of the complexities of implementing TB-IPC within routine health systems, particularly those facing substantive resource constraints. This scoping review maps documented system influences on TB-IPC implementation in health facilities of low/middle-income countries (LMICs).

methodsWe conducted a systematic search of empirical research published before July 2018 and included studies reporting TB-IPC implementation at health facility level in LMICs. Bibliometric data and narratives describing health system influences on TB-IPC implementation were extracted following established methodological frameworks for conducting scoping reviews. A best-fit framework synthesis was applied in which extracted data were deductively coded against an existing health policy and systems research framework, distinguishing between social and political context, policy decisions, and system hardware (eg, information systems, human resources, service infrastructure) and software (ideas and interests, relationships and power, values and norms).

resultsOf 1156 unique search results, we retained 77 studies; two-thirds were conducted in sub-Saharan Africa, with more than half located in South Africa. Notable sociopolitical and policy influences impacting on TB-IPC implementation include stigma against TB and the availability of facility-specific TB-IPC policies, respectively. Hardware influences on TB-IPC implementation referred to availability, knowledge and educational development of staff, timeliness of service delivery, availability of equipment, such as respirators and masks, space for patient separation, funding, and TB-IPC information, education and communication materials and tools. Commonly reported health system software influences were workplace values and established practices, staff agency, TB risk perceptions and fears as well as staff attitudes towards TB-IPC.

conclusionTB-IPC is critically dependent on health system factors. This review identified the health system factors and health system research gaps that can be considered in a whole system approach to strengthen TB-IPC practices at facility levels in LMICs.

Indexed as

Developing CountriesTuberculosisAttitude of Health PersonnelHealth FacilitiesHealth PolicyHumanshealth systems evaluationprevention strategiesreviewtuberculosis

Identifiers

PMID33975887
PMCPMC8118012

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.