Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33975627›Full record

ArticleGenome biology2021

Functional mapping of androgen receptor enhancer activity.

Chia-Chi Flora Huang, Shreyas Lingadahalli, Tunc Morova, Dogancan Ozturan, Eugene Hu, Ivan Pak Lok Yu, Simon Linder, Marlous Hoogstraat, Suzan Stelloo, Funda Sar and 14 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome biology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Distinct transcription factor interactions drive HOXB13 activity in different stages of prostate cancer.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. The androgen receptor in bladder cancer.Nature reviews. Urology · 2023
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

24 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

Chia-Chi Flora Huang *Vancouver Prostate Centre, Department of Urologic Science, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
Shreyas Lingadahalli *Vancouver Prostate Centre, Department of Urologic Science, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
Tunc Morova *Vancouver Prostate Centre, Department of Urologic Science, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
Dogancan Ozturan *School of Medicine, Koç University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Eugene HuDepartment of Physics, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, Canada.
Ivan Pak Lok YuVancouver Prostate Centre, Department of Urologic Science, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
Simon LinderDivision of Oncogenomics, Oncode Institute, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Marlous HoogstraatDivision of Oncogenomics, Oncode Institute, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Suzan StellooDivision of Oncogenomics, Oncode Institute, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Funda SarVancouver Prostate Centre, Department of Urologic Science, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
Henk van der PoelDivision of Urology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Umut Berkay AltintasSchool of Medicine, Koç University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Mohammadali SaffarzadehVancouver Prostate Centre, Department of Urologic Science, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
Stephane Le BihanVancouver Prostate Centre, Department of Urologic Science, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
Brian McConeghyVancouver Prostate Centre, Department of Urologic Science, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
Bengul GokbayrakSchool of Medicine, Koç University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Felix Y FengHelen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco, USA.
Martin E GleaveVancouver Prostate Centre, Department of Urologic Science, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
Andries M BergmanDivision of Oncogenomics, Oncode Institute, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Colin CollinsVancouver Prostate Centre, Department of Urologic Science, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
Faraz HachVancouver Prostate Centre, Department of Urologic Science, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
Wilbert ZwartDivision of Oncogenomics, Oncode Institute, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Eldon EmberlyDepartment of Physics, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, Canada.
Nathan A LackVancouver Prostate Centre, Department of Urologic Science, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada. nlack@prostatecentre.com.
University of British Columbia · CAThe Netherlands Cancer Institute · NLKoç University · TRSimon Fraser University · CAOncode Institute · NLUCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAndrogen receptor (AR) is critical to the initiation, growth, and progression of prostate cancer. Once activated, the AR binds to cis-regulatory enhancer elements on DNA that drive gene expression. Yet, there are 10-100× more binding sites than differentially expressed genes. It is unclear how or if these excess binding sites impact gene transcription.

resultsTo characterize the regulatory logic of AR-mediated transcription, we generated a locus-specific map of enhancer activity by functionally testing all common clinical AR binding sites with Self-Transcribing Active Regulatory Regions sequencing (STARRseq). Only 7% of AR binding sites displayed androgen-dependent enhancer activity. Instead, the vast majority of AR binding sites were either inactive or constitutively active enhancers. These annotations strongly correlated with enhancer-associated features of both in vitro cell lines and clinical prostate cancer samples. Evaluating the effect of each enhancer class on transcription, we found that AR-regulated enhancers frequently interact with promoters and form central chromosomal loops that are required for transcription. Somatic mutations of these critical AR-regulated enhancers often impact enhancer activity.

conclusionsUsing a functional map of AR enhancer activity, we demonstrated that AR-regulated enhancers act as a regulatory hub that increases interactions with other AR binding sites and gene promoters.

Indexed as

Enhancer Elements, GeneticCell Line, TumorGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticGene Regulatory NetworksGenome, HumanHumansMaleMolecular Sequence AnnotationMutationPolymorphism, Single NucleotideProstatic NeoplasmsReceptors, AndrogenReproducibility of ResultsReceptors, AndrogenAndrogen receptorEnhancersNon-coding mutationsProstate cancerSTARRseq

Identifiers

PMID33975627
PMCPMC8112059
OpenAlexW3160325452

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.