SynthesisReproductive biology and endocrinology : RB&E2021
Dose adjustment of follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) during ovarian stimulation as part of medically-assisted reproduction in clinical studies: a systematic review covering 10 years (2007-2017).
Synthesis in Reproductive biology and endocrinology : RB&E, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
32 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 50 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Type of Follicle-Stimulating Hormone Medication Given for In Vitro Fertilization Impacts Oocyte Retrieval: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics · 2025Pooled it
- Beyond the Umbrella: A Systematic Review of the Interventions for the Prevention of and Reduction in the Incidence and Severity of Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome in Patients Who Undergo In Vitro Fertilization Treatments.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Pooled it
- Ovarian stimulation with follitropin delta for in vitro fertilization: a multicentre, randomized, assessor-blind comparison with follitropin alfa using conventional dosing regimens (ADAPT-1 trial).Human reproduction (Oxford, England) · 2025Trial
- Optimizing family building in women of advanced reproductive age: a Faster-Fewer-and-Finished approach.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Review
- Ovarian intelligence: AI applications leveraging AMH and inhibin B.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Review
- Dual Impact of Estradiol Fluctuations in the Final Three Days on IVF/ICSI Outcomes: A Retrospective Cohort Analysis.JBRA assisted reproduction · 2025Article
- Predicting the optimal timing for triggering in controlled ovarian stimulation: mature oocytes retrieval predictor.Reproductive biology and endocrinology : RB&E · 2025Article
- Article
- Unexpected hypo-responders in in vitro fertilization: The impact of higher gonadotropin doses on oocyte yield.Turkish journal of obstetrics and gynecology · 2025Article
- Deep learning-based prediction of individualized Real-time FSH doses in GnRH agonist long protocols.Journal of translational medicine · 2025Article
- Unraveling the Clinical FSH Conundrum: Insights From the Small Ovarian Reserve Heifer Model.Molecular reproduction and development · 2025Review
- A retrospective study: establishment and validation of the prediction model for the gonadotropin starting dose in IVF/ICSI-ET among normal ovarian response women.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2025Article
- Minimising OHSS in women with PCOS.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2025Review
- Clinical data-based modeling of IVF live birth outcome and its application.Reproductive biology and endocrinology : RB&E · 2024Article
- Significance ofInternational journal of reproductive biomedicine · 2024Article
- The regulatory roles of Smad2/3 protein andInternational journal of reproductive biomedicine · 2024Article
- Effect of different starting doses of FSH on laboratory and clinical outcomes in patients with moderate AMH level.Hormones (Athens, Greece) · 2024Article
- In vitro matured oocytes have a higher developmental potential than in vivo matured oocytes after hormonal ovarian stimulation in Callithrix jacchus.Journal of ovarian research · 2024Article
- Nonlinear relationship between gonadotropin total dose applied and live birth rates in non-PCOS patients: a retrospective cohort study.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- FSH/LH co-stimulation in Advanced Maternal Age (AMA) and hypo-responder patients - Arabian gulf delphi consensus group.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundIndividualization of the follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) starting dose is considered standard clinical practice during controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) in patients undergoing assisted reproductive technology (ART) treatment. Furthermore, the gonadotropin dose is regularly adjusted during COS to avoid hyper- or hypo-ovarian response, but limited data are currently available to characterize such adjustments. This review describes the frequency and direction (increase/decrease) of recombinant-human FSH (r-hFSH) dose adjustment reported in clinical trials.
methodsWe evaluated the proportion of patients undergoing ART treatment who received ≥ 1 r-hFSH dose adjustments. The inclusion criteria included studies (published Sept 2007 to Sept 2017) in women receiving ART treatment that allowed dose adjustment within the study protocol and that reported ≥ 1 dose adjustments of r-hFSH; studies not allowing/reporting dose adjustment were excluded. Data on study design, dose adjustment and patient characteristics were extracted. Point-incidence estimates were calculated per study and overall based on pooled number of cycles with dose adjustment across studies. The Clopper-Pearson method was used to calculate 95% confidence intervals (CI) for incidence where adjustment occurred in < 10% of patients; otherwise, a normal approximation method was used.
resultsInitially, 1409 publications were identified, of which 318 were excluded during initial screening and 1073 were excluded after full text review for not meeting the inclusion criteria. Eighteen studies (6630 cycles) reported dose adjustment: 5/18 studies (1359 cycles) reported data for an unspecified dose adjustment (direction not defined), in 10/18 studies (3952 cycles) dose increases were reported, and in 11/18 studies (5123 cycles) dose decreases were reported. The studies were performed in women with poor, normal and high response, with one study reporting in oocyte donors and one in obese women. The median day that dose adjustment was permitted was Day 6 after the start of treatment. The point estimates for incidence (95% CI) for unspecified dose adjustment, dose increases, and dose decreases were 45.3% (42.7, 48.0), 19.2% (18.0, 20.5), and 9.5% (8.7, 10.3), respectively.
conclusionsThis systematic review highlights that, in studies in which dose adjustment was allowed and reported, the estimated incidence of r-hFSH dose adjustments during ovarian stimulation was up to 45%.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.