Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33975610›Full record

SynthesisReproductive biology and endocrinology : RB&E2021

Dose adjustment of follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) during ovarian stimulation as part of medically-assisted reproduction in clinical studies: a systematic review covering 10 years (2007-2017).

Human Fatemi, Wilma Bilger, Deborah Denis, Georg Griesinger, Antonio La Marca, Salvatore Longobardi, Mary Mahony, Xiaoyan Yin, Thomas D'Hooghe

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Reproductive biology and endocrinology : RB&E, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
7.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Minimising OHSS in women with PCOS.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2025
    Review
  14. Clinical data-based modeling of IVF live birth outcome and its application.Reproductive biology and endocrinology : RB&E · 2024
    Article
  15. Significance ofInternational journal of reproductive biomedicine · 2024
    Article
  16. The regulatory roles of Smad2/3 protein andInternational journal of reproductive biomedicine · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Human FatemiART Fertility Clinics, Abu Dhabi & Dubai and Muscat Royal Marina Village, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.
Wilma BilgerMedical Affairs Fertility, Endocrinology & General Medicine, Merck Serono GmbH (an affiliate of Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany), Darmstadt, Germany.
Deborah DenisGlobal Clinical Development, EMD Serono Research and Development Institute, Inc (an affiliate of Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany), Billerica, MA, USA.
Georg GriesingerDepartment of Gynecological Endocrinology and Reproductive Medicine, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Lübeck, Germany.
Antonio La MarcaDipartimento di Scienze Mediche e Chirurgiche Materno-Infantili e dell'Adulto, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia and Clinica Eugin Modena, Modena, Italy.
Salvatore LongobardiGlobal Clinical Development, Merck Serono S.p.A (an affiliate of Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany), 00176, Rome, Italy.
Mary MahonyMedical Affairs - Endocrinology/Reproductive Health, EMD Serono, Inc (an affiliate of Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany), Rockland, MA, USA.
Xiaoyan YinResearch & Development, EMD Serono, Inc (an affiliate of Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany), Billerica, MA, USA.
Thomas D'HoogheGlobal Medical Affairs Fertility, Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany. thomas.dhooghe@merckgroup.com.
Merck (Germany) · DEKU Leuven · BEMerck Serono (Italy) · ITUniversity of Lübeck · DEUniversity of Modena and Reggio Emilia · IT

Funding

Merck KGaA N/A
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIndividualization of the follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) starting dose is considered standard clinical practice during controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) in patients undergoing assisted reproductive technology (ART) treatment. Furthermore, the gonadotropin dose is regularly adjusted during COS to avoid hyper- or hypo-ovarian response, but limited data are currently available to characterize such adjustments. This review describes the frequency and direction (increase/decrease) of recombinant-human FSH (r-hFSH) dose adjustment reported in clinical trials.

methodsWe evaluated the proportion of patients undergoing ART treatment who received ≥ 1 r-hFSH dose adjustments. The inclusion criteria included studies (published Sept 2007 to Sept 2017) in women receiving ART treatment that allowed dose adjustment within the study protocol and that reported ≥ 1 dose adjustments of r-hFSH; studies not allowing/reporting dose adjustment were excluded. Data on study design, dose adjustment and patient characteristics were extracted. Point-incidence estimates were calculated per study and overall based on pooled number of cycles with dose adjustment across studies. The Clopper-Pearson method was used to calculate 95% confidence intervals (CI) for incidence where adjustment occurred in < 10% of patients; otherwise, a normal approximation method was used.

resultsInitially, 1409 publications were identified, of which 318 were excluded during initial screening and 1073 were excluded after full text review for not meeting the inclusion criteria. Eighteen studies (6630 cycles) reported dose adjustment: 5/18 studies (1359 cycles) reported data for an unspecified dose adjustment (direction not defined), in 10/18 studies (3952 cycles) dose increases were reported, and in 11/18 studies (5123 cycles) dose decreases were reported. The studies were performed in women with poor, normal and high response, with one study reporting in oocyte donors and one in obese women. The median day that dose adjustment was permitted was Day 6 after the start of treatment. The point estimates for incidence (95% CI) for unspecified dose adjustment, dose increases, and dose decreases were 45.3% (42.7, 48.0), 19.2% (18.0, 20.5), and 9.5% (8.7, 10.3), respectively.

conclusionsThis systematic review highlights that, in studies in which dose adjustment was allowed and reported, the estimated incidence of r-hFSH dose adjustments during ovarian stimulation was up to 45%.

Indexed as

Clinical Trials as TopicDose-Response Relationship, DrugDrug TaperingFemaleFollicle Stimulating HormoneHumansOvarian Hyperstimulation SyndromeOvulation InductionRecombinant ProteinsReproductive Techniques, AssistedFollicle Stimulating HormoneRecombinant ProteinsAssisted reproductive technology (ART) treatmentControlled ovarian stimulation (COS)Follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH)FollitropinFSH dose adjustmentIn vitro fertilization (IVF)Medically-assisted reproductionRecombinant-human FSHSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID33975610
PMCPMC8112039
OpenAlexW3161594406

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.