Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33975584›Full record

ArticleBMC women's health2021

Postoperative urinary retention after pelvic organ prolapse surgery: influence of peri-operative factors and trial of void protocol.

B C Anglim, K Ramage, E Sandwith, E A Brennand, Calgary Women’s Pelvic Health Research Group

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC women's health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

B C AnglimSection of Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaeacology, Foothills Medical Centre, School of Medicine, University of Calgary, 1403 29 Street Northwest, Calgary, AB, T2N 2T9, Canada. breffini.anglim@gmail.com.
K RamageSection of Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaeacology, Foothills Medical Centre, School of Medicine, University of Calgary, 1403 29 Street Northwest, Calgary, AB, T2N 2T9, Canada.
E SandwithSection of Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaeacology, Foothills Medical Centre, School of Medicine, University of Calgary, 1403 29 Street Northwest, Calgary, AB, T2N 2T9, Canada.
E A BrennandSection of Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaeacology, Foothills Medical Centre, School of Medicine, University of Calgary, 1403 29 Street Northwest, Calgary, AB, T2N 2T9, Canada.
Calgary Women’s Pelvic Health Research Group
University of Calgary · CAFoothills Medical Centre · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTransient postoperative urinary retention (POUR) is common after pelvic floor surgery. We aimed to determine the association between peri-operative variables and POUR and to determine the number of voids required for post-void residuals (PVRs) to normalize postoperatively.

methodsWe conducted a retrospective cohort study of 992 patients undergoing pelvic floor surgery at a tertiary referral centre from January 2015 to October 2017. Variables assessed included: age, BMI, ASA score, anaesthesia type, type of surgery, length of postoperative stay, surgeon, bladder protocol used, and number of PVRs required to "pass" the protocol.

resultsSignificant risk factors for POUR included: placement of MUS during POP surgery, anterior repair and hysterectomy with concomitant sacrospinous vault suspension. A total of 25.1% were discharged requiring catheterization. Patients receiving a concomitant mid-urethral sling (MUS) were 2.2 (95% CI1.6-2.9) and 2.3 (95% CI 1.8-3.1) times more likely to have elevated PVR after their second TOV and third TOV (p < 0.0001), respectively, compared with those without concomitant MUS. Permitting a third TOV allowed an additional 10% of women to pass the voiding protocol before discharge. The median number of voids to pass protocol was 2. An ASA > 2 and placement of MUS were associated with increasing number of voids needed to pass protocol.

conclusionsWhile many women passed protocol by the second void, using the 3rd void as a cut point to determine success would result in fewer women requiring catheterization after discharge. Prior to pelvic floor surgery, women should be counselled regarding POUR probability to allow for management of postoperative expectations.

Indexed as

Pelvic Organ ProlapseSuburethral SlingsUrinary Incontinence, StressUrinary RetentionFemaleHumansPostoperative ComplicationsRetrospective StudiesPostoperative urinary retentionPostoperative voiding trialUrinary retentionVoiding dysfunction

Identifiers

PMID33975584
PMCPMC8111911
OpenAlexW3119053505

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.